>>536230787
>By matching based on queue times, in order to prevent players from getting impatient and quitting the game (i.e., churn, defined as ENGAGEMENT, here >>536229760) you could, in effect, be said to be using a soft for of EOMM.
Except mental gymnastics and fallacies doesn't magically turn apples into rubber ducks.

EOMM is a very specific framework that has nothing to do with queue times or bots. If you're then not using that exact framework, then by definition it's not EOMM.
You're trying to pull some prequel Yoda shit with
>Fear leads to Anger, Anger leads to Hate, Hate leads to suffering
with logical fallacies. You outright bend your own logic just so you can say "soft EOMM".

But why bother, your explicit demented goal is this
>get someone to admit that bots = eomm
>this means the game as a whole uses eomm
>this means automatically every single prior schizo theory you had about eomm now magically becomes truth and fact, despite having no facts or evidence to back it up
It's in fact very very sad. All so you have a boogeyman to blame for why you're not Celestial. Especially when by your own logic the game would've handed you tons of free wins which you ignore, because you only focus on the the losses (i.e. something to blame).
They outright made a video you plugged your ears about (which we all knew you would) just so you can keep rambling on like the schizo you are.

Honestly you clinically insane people are better just to ignore, because you're clearly just here for attention.

>>534027519
>he does like basically everything id expect mag to do

Is this a fucking joke or are you just a brainless fucktard

>>530018556
>This has had 0 impact on anything
nigger were you asleep when they fought tooth and nail to force this game to be online only and pvp only JUST to make sure players would participate in their in-game economy? there's no cash shop. you're the product and you fucked with their money. you're right that they probably won't VAC ban you or anything but you're definitely getting sent on a short vacation at a minimum.

>>3796158
>It's ridiculous in RPGs how people make decisions based on morals or ideology, nobody gives a shit about that stuff in reality and operate on self-interest

The mistake you're making here is assuming everyone is like you. They aren't.

Most people are a mix, but there are always extremes where people are purely dirtven by self-interest (like you) and others which prioritize being kind over their own benefit.

Are you some anti-social cave dweller psychopath? Even casually interacting with other people would've taught you this much. People are all very different.