>>216525283
I would like to see the same study with the same methodology aplied to other parts of Europe.
That "black" DNA also exist in all of Europe and it is just BASAL OUT-OF-AFRICA DNA.
Look at the Swedish, 0.55 black dna, the same as andalucians. Understand it, Indian?
4chan Search
8 results for "1c5a9c3ece2e381c25608a858e495799"
>>17976263
>Most Iberians are 1-3% SSA, so they are not white.
Then Swedish are not white either.
People don´t get how BASAL dna works. All humans came out of Africa and the most homogenous group of people (for example Iberians) keep that ancient DNA better.
>Most Iberians are 1-3% SSA, so they are not white.
Then Swedish are not white either.
People don´t get how BASAL dna works. All humans came out of Africa and the most homogenous group of people (for example Iberians) keep that ancient DNA better.
>>17938143
The same in the rest of Europe using the same criteria. It is basal African from the Out of Africa theory that all Europeans have in different degrees (depending how homogeneous is the population and Iberians are one of the most homogeneous groups in Europe). Sweden scores 0.55 Subsaharian DNA, the same as in Spain. Also NorthEast African.
When they do their DNA "scientific" papers they should not use other papers to compare with their own paper because they could have used different ways to test the population.
>>17938169
You seem to not know how to read. I said that the same person looks different depending on the lighting conditions and you brown people are constantly using the worst lighting conditions to portrait Spaniards.
The same in the rest of Europe using the same criteria. It is basal African from the Out of Africa theory that all Europeans have in different degrees (depending how homogeneous is the population and Iberians are one of the most homogeneous groups in Europe). Sweden scores 0.55 Subsaharian DNA, the same as in Spain. Also NorthEast African.
When they do their DNA "scientific" papers they should not use other papers to compare with their own paper because they could have used different ways to test the population.
>>17938169
You seem to not know how to read. I said that the same person looks different depending on the lighting conditions and you brown people are constantly using the worst lighting conditions to portrait Spaniards.
>>213980821
Those maps are basically invented.
In serious studies Sweden have the same subsaharan as Iberians because it is not subsaharan it is basal out-of-africa DNA that some populations still have them.
Those maps are basically invented.
In serious studies Sweden have the same subsaharan as Iberians because it is not subsaharan it is basal out-of-africa DNA that some populations still have them.
>>17923070
Again with the lies. It depends on who makes the studies. Here you can see in other study that most Europeans have subsaharan DNA, even Sweden is on par with Iberia.
So, the conclussion is clear, it is not northafrican or subsaharan but ANCIENT basal DNA that dna companies can´t differenciate and make a mixture and label it as northafrican or subsaharan because they also have basal DNA.
Again with the lies. It depends on who makes the studies. Here you can see in other study that most Europeans have subsaharan DNA, even Sweden is on par with Iberia.
So, the conclussion is clear, it is not northafrican or subsaharan but ANCIENT basal DNA that dna companies can´t differenciate and make a mixture and label it as northafrican or subsaharan because they also have basal DNA.
>>17870026
Look Sweden also has a lot of SSA.
Those are FAKE results.
>>17870120
carthaginian were just in the SouthEast and were like 1% of the population.
Alans were like 0.01% of the population.
Maybe we should start to check how much mongol (protouralic or from the hunns) half of Europe has. Much higher than carthaginian or alans in Iberia.
Look Sweden also has a lot of SSA.
Those are FAKE results.
>>17870120
carthaginian were just in the SouthEast and were like 1% of the population.
Alans were like 0.01% of the population.
Maybe we should start to check how much mongol (protouralic or from the hunns) half of Europe has. Much higher than carthaginian or alans in Iberia.
>>509584188
LOL.
And for those that speak about slightly nonwhite admixture in Europeans here you have Swedish scoring subsaharan blood.
LOL.
And for those that speak about slightly nonwhite admixture in Europeans here you have Swedish scoring subsaharan blood.
>>17758733
They never check in the same studies the ""northern african"" in other European countries using the same methodology.
And "northern African" is misleading since NorthAfrica received like 30% European genetics since ancient times (WHG, Neolithic, etc). In fact, berebers are full of European haplogroups. That is the ""northafrican"" in Iberians they are talking about.
They never check in the same studies the ""northern african"" in other European countries using the same methodology.
And "northern African" is misleading since NorthAfrica received like 30% European genetics since ancient times (WHG, Neolithic, etc). In fact, berebers are full of European haplogroups. That is the ""northafrican"" in Iberians they are talking about.