>>18761741
Nowhere near ass shitty and stupid as OP's webm. You seem intent on deflecting any negative discussion of WWE/it's subsidiary promotions. And you don't even get paid to.
>>18116959
How did this dude go from from shitty hot take twitter posts to having a full on podcast? Dude you can smell how much of a loser he is even from just the screen shots of his twitter posts.