>>717769373
It'd be repetition (not like that stopped them before) but could be the other surviving shards are
>Fuck these sourciggers we're going to get them before they get us
Kinda feels like an easy Ascian ploy to, warriors of darkness style, turn the shards against the source. Or real cliche given it's basically amaurotines all over again, but have some ark of survivors of the various calamities working to try and conquer/unjoin the source. Which would be a repeat of the original ascian plot but reversed into anti-rejoiners wanting now to rob the source of its aether.

Honestly given how japanese creativity (or lack thereof) is I kinda can see this happening now that I say it. If not lightning-world scheme of jumping into the source itself then survivors of the calamities wanting to de-rejoin the source.

>>531682826
I get it, and you can definitely make that lateral move - in a way it's a show of greater creativity because you aren't just doing cargo cult patisches (IE LOTR but anime) but it still just surprises me to thunk about.

It'd be like if you had themes of the Sopranos or HBO's Rome end up manifesting in a Korean animated series about a bunch of animal-ear-girls in a cooking academy. That's kinda cute though, got me imagining a big dumb ox-girl whose from academy dorm-room-13 crying out "THIRTEEEENNTHH" as she's desperately trying to keep pace cooking against a group of competitors while she's all alone. RIP Titus Pullo

It's both very cool to see creators draw an inspiration from something very different but also so peculiar unless you really knew it for certain you'd be a little skeptical. Like hearing Twin Peaks directly inspired FF7 has me wondering if it did or if it was a chain of inspiring X which inspired Y which inspired FF7.

>>531683159
Yeah it was talking with a friend who was trying to beat the heat and she goes "I'll do it later wet hair =x" that made me think
>O shidd yea no wonder it sucks for thick hair women.
Since I know a dutch-girl and me mum who also aren't as big on showering and also have thick/long hair.

>>715679640
That's why I ran with the sacrificial scapegoat theory earlier >>715677675. The sacrifice will be either Ralsei has to betray. It may be that it's a fate worse than death in that he'll take the excess darkness and be in a world darker than dark, maybe taking the place of Dess who seems to be in that situation right now(?).

If we're going 1:1 to biblical scapegoats, which is not really likely to go 1:1 but if we do, then the blood of one sacrifice is painted on the other. And there's a real symbolism potential to Susie's bloody hand leaving Ralsei's white fur with blood. Susie not being a goat and all aside, it could mean one has to die and the other has to take the sin (blame?). But it could also be Kris or (you) who is the first sacrifice, with Ralsei taking the blame (Scapegoat).

I can buy the tragedy of 2 heroes die, 1 lives, more than 1 hero dies and two live.

>>715586273
Yeah friend said it was in caps but when I watched it I didn't see that. I neglected to say my big thunk was 'love finds its way to the girl' and if it's the heart (you) it could be noelle or susie, but it could also be dess given
>Findher.mp3
As to the hope bit I just remember seeing her say that line outright, "Hope crossed on my heart" or something to that (hope and cross and heart). I just can't remember if it was pre prophecy (helping her be the 2nd hero) or after (meaning she's trying to make herself into it).

It's what I think is neat with writing a prophecy right - you can have multiple correct interpretations. With your mentioning of the pen while that'll happen in any route I still just have this feeling of "three heroes being those three is way too straightforward".

I don't necessarily buy the "happened before and there was a prior group of heroes" either, I just found that findher, love-finds-its-way-to-the-girl to be interesting. At the same time swapping in a new character midway through and making them central feels like a big gamble.

>Incest
It's really weird how much this one just gets targeted. Like I think it's more some high ranking credit card company executive got fucked up by incest in the past and that's why he (or she) goes jihad on it >>715561318

The excuse I heard before is porn gets chargebacks a lot. And sure I get that, and I get going after nonce shit, but it's just weird that incest has the same company as nonce pedo shit.


And I don't even like incest. I'm non-con/dub-con. I get why they forbid that (and you can baby-its-cold-outside to make it non-con-to-con) but I don't get why incest gets nooked.

I'd like to see politicians who are more about ideas than ideology. I am sure this guy is an ideologue but it's like
>CITY RUN GROCERY STORE IS COMMUNIST!
Well why is a city run grocery store a bad idea? There are bad reasons, sure, but there are good reasons too. We could consider either and see if we can split the middle or we can just have politics take the place of religion where tenets are more important than practice and you have to do something because that's the dogma, nevermind if it works or doesn't.

I just realised something. Israel allowed a nation that could have nukes to throw barrage after barrage of missiles at them without any instant nuclear retaliation, or even any instant retaliation at all, just a delayed tit-for-tat.

You could argue that it's because they knew Iran doesn't have nukes, but I think it means something else: you can just nuke Israel and they won't do anything. They don't have a finger on the trigger ready to unload their nuclear arsenal on you as soon as they see blips on their radar, you can just send them a barrage of nukes and they'll just die, mostly now that there Arrow 3 system is depleted, they're just sitting them, defenseless.

>>507084775
>domain for sale