>>212573563
>so you're entire argument is the earnings
your*
Of course. Why wouldn't it be? Do you think Zaslav gives a shit about the reviews? Do you think Gunn's contract will be renewed if this movie severely under-performs, or let him have the same autonomy if it fails to meet expectations?
How do you differentiate paid shills and bots from actual people? Well, shills are a lot louder and bots don't buy tickets. So...yes, this movie's success comes down to the Box Office, and not the number of "oh it was decent" reviews.