>>717112113
>Asmongold fans are subhuman, just like their cult leader

>>716518118
>it's time for woke! prepare to die chuds!

>>511300642
>Posting personal data, even images of someone without their consent
>Yeah no
Yes, how can this be allowed? Posting images of people without their consent? OUTRAGEOUS!
>>511300351
Seriously though, how would you even know you have been posted there? Did someone tell him, or did he do the drag thing suggested earlier?

>>715078714
>>715057142
They're getting their wish: the western AAA model is collapsing, and studios will likely find little reason to have any faith in westerners. So they're gonna outsource it.

The entire Western Day-care center is going to end. These people are going to all end up on the street.

>>509964309
Thank fucking god. It's youtube not aitube. you have to be a you to be part of you tube. wow.

>>714963089
rope

>>714270343
>is supposed to be some pivotal moment, and the first thing the Wikipedia article says is that sex with reviewers didn’t even happen so it’s like wtf am I reading

Up to 2008 many of these guys were nominally left leaning, politically inactive, or libertarians. The live and let live attitude is quite common among guys. You now have guys embracing anti-woke (or at the time "SJW") attitudes, following their youtubes, reading online right wing publications. So they aliented a lot of non-right wing guys and channeled them into right wing movements.

Think of it this way. There is a culture war. It continually expands and creates new battle fields. Each time there's a new battle, they may "win" but it alienates more and more people.

The left has been slowly losing males since 2011, when the online "great awokening" started to happen. It reached the tipping point probably around 2020 and has gotten worse and worse since.

>is that sex with reviewers didn’t even happen so it’s like wtf am I reading

It's contested, and Zoe Quinn never admited anything, and regular media relied upon gaming media to report on this. Maybe it didn't happen, who cares? At this point it doesn't even matter.

If they were just transparent, did an investigation, they could have calmed things down. Instead they circled the wagons and went on the offensive, not realizing how fragile their positions are.

>>714176042
>Not at all, it's an objective analysis as to the problem of whence value originates.

I fucking spit out my drink. No, it's a "moral" theory". To say there's a "problem" implies something is "Bad" which is just another way of saying morals. You let it slip it's a moral theory masquarading as an economic one.

It holds that all value that is taken by middle-management and owners is stolen. Marxism is thus about fixing that. It's moral hogwash, and typical of leftist thought: find the moral problem, propose an idealistic solution, then try to impliment it until the entire system collapses. Any questions about how valid the theory is is heracy and shows lack of commitment to the moral cause.

Instead, you should focus on how the world IS before you figure out changes to reform the system.

Are you excited for tomorrow, Jurassic Park fans?

>>509195174
well... Deftons were "cool" also see>>509195237 There are alot of things people think are cool now that wont be in just a few years. hide and watch.

>>211777815
>.