>>510880939
Romania is just anti-freedoms
they think it's an infatuation to be free and that "normal" people should bust ass all day long otherwise they're not considered regular people
Romanian society is highly fascist, but pettily so in the sense that they actually lack the discipline or focus required to actually be fascist, so they're more like a thanatocracy than having an actual plan
>we cancel elections if the wrong guy is winning
"free speech" is meaningless to Romanians, to them clearly 99% of the population represent the expandables and "progress" always comes from ex-commie barons so what would be the point of even bothering with free speech?
a country like Romania just represents empire fallout but it's a region of the world that does not really have an internal culture in terms of governance that would not be the same with every other country in the region
these are not a people that founded their "state" on a clearly-defined set of rules, laws, and then made amendments or thought about "being free from tyrants" or abolishing "kings"
even the Romanian constitution looks like it was drafted by someone on a napkin after a conference in France when they said "well okay, let's be democratic then" but all the principles expressed by a constitution are not something that "the Romanian people" are convinced of
stuff like not abusing women or not being allowed to smack your kids from time to time are ironically seen as a loss of rights to Romanians, not the reverse, like the equity would represent a common "shared-value"
even during communism, Romanians eductated their children to avoid any sort of responsibility or accountibility entirely, so even pretending that these people would pursue some "elated goals" is laughable
they don't fight tyrants, they are the tyrants!