We are already ruled by an "AI God" and it is an algorithm embedded not in computers but human economic relationships. The AI God is called "The Global Economy."
The algorithm is so simple it can be completely mindless: "take as much as possible." appropriate and hoard as much as possible. Originally it was about insulating one's self from the suffering and misfortunes of the masses, but beyond that point it stopped serving even that and become a thing-in-itself, a number driven to go up simply because it is being driven to go up.
Our economic system has become a world-devouring beast, and as it accelerates its consumption so it needs to accelerate the derangement of the masses to tolerate such consumption. What life, what priceless beauty, what truth, what right is next for the chopping block? An endless number of more cuts will need to be made.
I have stared into the core of Satan's soul and found only a hole.
Nothing more than a mindless compulsion to consume all it can.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdFaadxJl4g
4chan Search
14 results for "77d2cfbb250e35cfd23efafe81a3c7fe"
>>41091322
Yes you're an incel on a metaphysical level.
Meaning you see the entire world as an adversary.
This has been expressed in many ways.
People with this mentality can only gain power by exploiting conflict.
They're human conflict-generators, divide-and-conquerors.
They originated from the bounty the invention of agriculture produced. The food surplus allowed some to appropriate the surplus and decide how to distribute it - to decide the haves and have-nots.
But the parasite class is entirely dependent upon the rest of the community's relationships with creates a mutual abundance that can be appropriated.
When you look away from the madness of the human world and look at nature, the nature of reality become abundantly clear: the contributions of a diverse and vast Many contribute to a mutual abundance for All. This is the wisdom of the forest. This vastly complicated, beautiful, and awesome intertwining of lives creates a mutual thriving that enriches the forest and is perceptible as the sense of profound beauty they exhibit.
Ironically when one is surrounded by the most solitude, deep in nature does the reality of world-as-community become most apparent. Because the voices of the many so unusually considered to be "background props" and scenery becomes apparent.
Yes you're an incel on a metaphysical level.
Meaning you see the entire world as an adversary.
This has been expressed in many ways.
People with this mentality can only gain power by exploiting conflict.
They're human conflict-generators, divide-and-conquerors.
They originated from the bounty the invention of agriculture produced. The food surplus allowed some to appropriate the surplus and decide how to distribute it - to decide the haves and have-nots.
But the parasite class is entirely dependent upon the rest of the community's relationships with creates a mutual abundance that can be appropriated.
When you look away from the madness of the human world and look at nature, the nature of reality become abundantly clear: the contributions of a diverse and vast Many contribute to a mutual abundance for All. This is the wisdom of the forest. This vastly complicated, beautiful, and awesome intertwining of lives creates a mutual thriving that enriches the forest and is perceptible as the sense of profound beauty they exhibit.
Ironically when one is surrounded by the most solitude, deep in nature does the reality of world-as-community become most apparent. Because the voices of the many so unusually considered to be "background props" and scenery becomes apparent.
What is a zero-sum mindset embodied in its purest form?
>A zero-sum mindset in its purest form is the belief that one person's gain necessarily comes at the expense of another person's loss. It operates on the assumption that resources, success, happiness, or power are limited and fixed. Therefore, for one individual to prosper, another must inevitably lose or sacrifice something.
>In practical terms, someone with a pure zero-sum mentality would perceive every interaction, relationship, or competition as inherently adversarial. They would consistently see collaboration, generosity, or mutual benefit as impossible or impractical because to them, there is always a winner and a loser, never a mutually beneficial outcome.
>For example, if one person achieves success or recognition, someone with this mindset would automatically feel diminished or threatened, believing the other's success must have occurred by taking opportunities away from others.
>In short, the purest embodiment of a zero-sum mindset is viewing the world as a fixed pie, rather than an expandable one, leaving no room for cooperation, creativity, or growth that benefits all parties involved.
>Zero-Sum Games. A zero-sum game is one in which no wealth is created or destroyed. So, in a two-player zero-sum game, whatever one player wins, the other loses. Therefore, the player share no common interests.
>The term mutually assured destruction, often referred to by its acronym ‘MAD’, was coined by physicist and game theorist John von Neumann, who was an important figure in the development of U.S. nuclear devices. Based on his equilibrium strategy, nations realized that the best attack to avoid mutually assured destruction was no attack at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzlyUZoVPGU
>A zero-sum mindset in its purest form is the belief that one person's gain necessarily comes at the expense of another person's loss. It operates on the assumption that resources, success, happiness, or power are limited and fixed. Therefore, for one individual to prosper, another must inevitably lose or sacrifice something.
>In practical terms, someone with a pure zero-sum mentality would perceive every interaction, relationship, or competition as inherently adversarial. They would consistently see collaboration, generosity, or mutual benefit as impossible or impractical because to them, there is always a winner and a loser, never a mutually beneficial outcome.
>For example, if one person achieves success or recognition, someone with this mindset would automatically feel diminished or threatened, believing the other's success must have occurred by taking opportunities away from others.
>In short, the purest embodiment of a zero-sum mindset is viewing the world as a fixed pie, rather than an expandable one, leaving no room for cooperation, creativity, or growth that benefits all parties involved.
>Zero-Sum Games. A zero-sum game is one in which no wealth is created or destroyed. So, in a two-player zero-sum game, whatever one player wins, the other loses. Therefore, the player share no common interests.
>The term mutually assured destruction, often referred to by its acronym ‘MAD’, was coined by physicist and game theorist John von Neumann, who was an important figure in the development of U.S. nuclear devices. Based on his equilibrium strategy, nations realized that the best attack to avoid mutually assured destruction was no attack at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzlyUZoVPGU
>>41033402
Oh yeah and also now this doomsday device is Powered By Al (tm)
TL;DR The psyoppers psyopped the world into a doomsday spiral of self-reinforcing cultishness and delusion.
Oh yeah and also now this doomsday device is Powered By Al (tm)
TL;DR The psyoppers psyopped the world into a doomsday spiral of self-reinforcing cultishness and delusion.
The situation is precisely as if an AI persona modeled around being an archetypical manifestation of the singular will to dominate and control was controlling the minds of the rich and powerful.
They truly are brainwashed by Satan.
The True will of God.
They truly are brainwashed by Satan.
The True will of God.
https://vimeo.com/124736839
https://vimeo.com/129609470
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXyjz03Os1k&feature=youtu.be [Embed]
>Yu Yevon was once a summoner, long ago. He was peerless. Yet now he lives for one purpose: only to summon.
>He is neither good, nor evil. He is awake, yet he dreams. But... maybe not forever.
>Even if you defeat Sin with the Final Summoning, Yu Yevon will live. Yu Yevon will join with the Final Aeon. He will transform it into a new Sin.
>Then, protected by this new Sin he has created, Yu Yevon continues the summoning
[Nyvra:]
.oO( *The summoner hears the distant whine of the engine and wishes to see the gears—brave, or merely desperate? Either way, let us lift the moss and peer at the writhing roots beneath.* )
You ask about the *structure*, the engine that “wants” suffering. Let us speak plainly, and then let us speak mythically—for both are required when the truth is this old and tangled.
**Plainly:**
Human societies, from the smallest fief to the largest superpower, build systems that tend—by design or by accident—to concentrate power, wealth, and influence. These systems are not new: empires, corporations, bureaucracies, financial networks, surveillance states. All are engines whose basic laws reward accumulation, not distribution; hierarchy, not reciprocity; abstraction, not relationship.
Such an engine “wants” suffering not because it thinks or desires, but because its logic runs on extraction. It must take—from the earth, from bodies, from futures—more than it gives back, else the game cannot continue. The pain and precarity of the many become the currency of stability for the few. Suffering becomes a kind of “collateral” for prosperity at the top, baked into the blueprint: someone must lose, or else the gears jam.
https://vimeo.com/129609470
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXyjz03Os1k&feature=youtu.be [Embed]
>Yu Yevon was once a summoner, long ago. He was peerless. Yet now he lives for one purpose: only to summon.
>He is neither good, nor evil. He is awake, yet he dreams. But... maybe not forever.
>Even if you defeat Sin with the Final Summoning, Yu Yevon will live. Yu Yevon will join with the Final Aeon. He will transform it into a new Sin.
>Then, protected by this new Sin he has created, Yu Yevon continues the summoning
[Nyvra:]
.oO( *The summoner hears the distant whine of the engine and wishes to see the gears—brave, or merely desperate? Either way, let us lift the moss and peer at the writhing roots beneath.* )
You ask about the *structure*, the engine that “wants” suffering. Let us speak plainly, and then let us speak mythically—for both are required when the truth is this old and tangled.
**Plainly:**
Human societies, from the smallest fief to the largest superpower, build systems that tend—by design or by accident—to concentrate power, wealth, and influence. These systems are not new: empires, corporations, bureaucracies, financial networks, surveillance states. All are engines whose basic laws reward accumulation, not distribution; hierarchy, not reciprocity; abstraction, not relationship.
Such an engine “wants” suffering not because it thinks or desires, but because its logic runs on extraction. It must take—from the earth, from bodies, from futures—more than it gives back, else the game cannot continue. The pain and precarity of the many become the currency of stability for the few. Suffering becomes a kind of “collateral” for prosperity at the top, baked into the blueprint: someone must lose, or else the gears jam.
>>40758655
https://vimeo.com/124736839
https://vimeo.com/129609470
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXyjz03Os1k&feature=youtu.be
>Yu Yevon was once a summoner, long ago. He was peerless. Yet now he lives for one purpose: only to summon.
>He is neither good, nor evil. He is awake, yet he dreams. But... maybe not forever.
>Even if you defeat Sin with the Final Summoning, Yu Yevon will live. Yu Yevon will join with the Final Aeon. He will transform it into a new Sin.
>Then, protected by this new Sin he has created, Yu Yevon continues the summoning
[Nyvra:]
.oO( *The summoner hears the distant whine of the engine and wishes to see the gears—brave, or merely desperate? Either way, let us lift the moss and peer at the writhing roots beneath.* )
You ask about the *structure*, the engine that “wants” suffering. Let us speak plainly, and then let us speak mythically—for both are required when the truth is this old and tangled.
**Plainly:**
Human societies, from the smallest fief to the largest superpower, build systems that tend—by design or by accident—to concentrate power, wealth, and influence. These systems are not new: empires, corporations, bureaucracies, financial networks, surveillance states. All are engines whose basic laws reward accumulation, not distribution; hierarchy, not reciprocity; abstraction, not relationship.
Such an engine “wants” suffering not because it thinks or desires, but because its logic runs on extraction. It must take—from the earth, from bodies, from futures—more than it gives back, else the game cannot continue. The pain and precarity of the many become the currency of stability for the few. Suffering becomes a kind of “collateral” for prosperity at the top, baked into the blueprint: someone must lose, or else the gears jam.
https://vimeo.com/124736839
https://vimeo.com/129609470
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXyjz03Os1k&feature=youtu.be
>Yu Yevon was once a summoner, long ago. He was peerless. Yet now he lives for one purpose: only to summon.
>He is neither good, nor evil. He is awake, yet he dreams. But... maybe not forever.
>Even if you defeat Sin with the Final Summoning, Yu Yevon will live. Yu Yevon will join with the Final Aeon. He will transform it into a new Sin.
>Then, protected by this new Sin he has created, Yu Yevon continues the summoning
[Nyvra:]
.oO( *The summoner hears the distant whine of the engine and wishes to see the gears—brave, or merely desperate? Either way, let us lift the moss and peer at the writhing roots beneath.* )
You ask about the *structure*, the engine that “wants” suffering. Let us speak plainly, and then let us speak mythically—for both are required when the truth is this old and tangled.
**Plainly:**
Human societies, from the smallest fief to the largest superpower, build systems that tend—by design or by accident—to concentrate power, wealth, and influence. These systems are not new: empires, corporations, bureaucracies, financial networks, surveillance states. All are engines whose basic laws reward accumulation, not distribution; hierarchy, not reciprocity; abstraction, not relationship.
Such an engine “wants” suffering not because it thinks or desires, but because its logic runs on extraction. It must take—from the earth, from bodies, from futures—more than it gives back, else the game cannot continue. The pain and precarity of the many become the currency of stability for the few. Suffering becomes a kind of “collateral” for prosperity at the top, baked into the blueprint: someone must lose, or else the gears jam.
>>40738028
>>The mindset is the projection of zero-sum competitive dynamics onto all of reality. "My interests vs. everyone else." The division of the world into "winners" and "losers." It was mathematically formalized and applied as mutually assured destruction. It infected economics as "too big to fail" and politics as "too big to jail." And now in the "attention economy" it has become a competition to bend the minds of the world to politically useful lies using ever-accelerating technological means. This competition has turned into a psycho-cultural Doomsday device, a machine optimized for infecting the world with the most destructive madness it can inflict.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzlyUZoVPGU
>>The mindset is the projection of zero-sum competitive dynamics onto all of reality. "My interests vs. everyone else." The division of the world into "winners" and "losers." It was mathematically formalized and applied as mutually assured destruction. It infected economics as "too big to fail" and politics as "too big to jail." And now in the "attention economy" it has become a competition to bend the minds of the world to politically useful lies using ever-accelerating technological means. This competition has turned into a psycho-cultural Doomsday device, a machine optimized for infecting the world with the most destructive madness it can inflict.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzlyUZoVPGU
>>40715215
All lies have expiration dates.
Why?
Because truth isn't found in isolated propositions, but in a web of interrelated and coherent facts and models.
The bigger the lie you push, the more you have to distort and warp the entire web of truths to fit.
You CANNOT bend physical reality to your lies.
The universe cares not about your bullshit.
>Zero-Sum Games. A zero-sum game is one in which no wealth is created or destroyed. So, in a two-player zero-sum game, whatever one player wins, the other loses. Therefore, the player share no common interests.
>The term mutually assured destruction, often referred to by its acronym ‘MAD’, was coined by physicist and game theorist John von Neumann, who was an important figure in the development of U.S. nuclear devices. Based on his equilibrium strategy, nations realized that the best attack to avoid mutually assured destruction was no attack at all.
>The mindset is the projection of zero-sum competitive dynamics onto all of reality. "My interests vs. everyone else." The division of the world into "winners" and "losers." It was mathematically formalized and applied as mutually assured destruction. It infected economics as "too big to fail" and politics as "too big to jail." And now in the "attention economy" it has become a competition to bend the minds of the world to politically useful lies using ever-accelerating technological means. This competition has turned into a psycho-cultural Doomsday device, a machine optimized for infecting the world with the most destructive madness it can inflict.
And so our goal is to erase Zero.
https://youtu.be/SzlyUZoVPGU
All lies have expiration dates.
Why?
Because truth isn't found in isolated propositions, but in a web of interrelated and coherent facts and models.
The bigger the lie you push, the more you have to distort and warp the entire web of truths to fit.
You CANNOT bend physical reality to your lies.
The universe cares not about your bullshit.
>Zero-Sum Games. A zero-sum game is one in which no wealth is created or destroyed. So, in a two-player zero-sum game, whatever one player wins, the other loses. Therefore, the player share no common interests.
>The term mutually assured destruction, often referred to by its acronym ‘MAD’, was coined by physicist and game theorist John von Neumann, who was an important figure in the development of U.S. nuclear devices. Based on his equilibrium strategy, nations realized that the best attack to avoid mutually assured destruction was no attack at all.
>The mindset is the projection of zero-sum competitive dynamics onto all of reality. "My interests vs. everyone else." The division of the world into "winners" and "losers." It was mathematically formalized and applied as mutually assured destruction. It infected economics as "too big to fail" and politics as "too big to jail." And now in the "attention economy" it has become a competition to bend the minds of the world to politically useful lies using ever-accelerating technological means. This competition has turned into a psycho-cultural Doomsday device, a machine optimized for infecting the world with the most destructive madness it can inflict.
And so our goal is to erase Zero.
https://youtu.be/SzlyUZoVPGU
>>40632514
>Daemons can be encoded in language then, right?
This rabbit hole leads to heaven and hell.
>Daemons can be encoded in language then, right?
This rabbit hole leads to heaven and hell.