>>40843009
No, I don't give a rat's ass. First of all I live my life for me, not for my parents. Second, their bloodline is going to die anyways. Every bloodline is going to die. In fact, the entire universe as we know it only has a relatively brief period of time in its overall lifespan where the concept of life and bloodlines can even possibly exist. None of it matters. Everything we all do, anything we ever accomplish, all of it is fated to irrelevance. It's egotistical delusion to think otherwise.

>>40747174
If I had feelings for her sure. That's one door that 99.99999% of people will never get their foot into, tho.

>>33444618
M he's dead and i never knew him

>>715774646
I have literally recently written papers on Christine Korsgaard's model of Kantian ethics in a sense that includes animal wellbeing, and I am currently working on a defense of threshold deontology. My dream is creating an overall framework that integrates the fact that complex systems evolve over time with a general approach to metaethics. For example, what if humans are no longer around? To what degree can we create automated systems that do not diverge from the original aim over time?