>>64130607
>Of course
Again, never mind the race aspect we already agree that from a top-down enforcement within prosecutorial/judicial system that is corrupt (similar to the Dirty Dozen states that ignore U.S. Supreme Court actively trying to grab law abiding citizens' magazines/guns/whatever)
>police just enforce
Yes. (and they -->aren't enforcing NFA here)
I'm talking about the boots-on-ground street LEOs, daily activity. Why does it matter, to them, whether Timmy has a switch or regular glock?
**FROM THE COP'S DAILY SHIFT PERSPECTIVE** (not the judge prosecutors system, all of it corrupt) And also the cop wanting to 'get home safe' that day.
Each switch-or-no-switch is equally deadly and capable of blowing Officer Friendly away.
Why would that, incentivize these LEOs to more aggressively enforce NFA? Doesn't make them, or us, safer. Timmy still gonna be out there with a stolen glock (switch or no switch)
Respond please. Do not mention race.
>>64130579
Yes I partially subscribe to this (would like to see more evidence)