>>61241016
As I said before it's not
>>61240988
Retail spending 1,500 on average slurps up all existing supply in a 10x current spot situation. This would be 150 a year for 10 years, and that's an effortless investment.
>They couldn't spend that much though!
The tiniest bit of investment would be that much ,the tiniest bit of capital flight. Any widespread adoption means the existing supply is now nonexistent and can be bought up by people with McJobs in one paycheck.
Sure, it's one thing to say
>If everyone invests X amount
But it's true at the end of the day, if it becomes a normal investment the same way the stock market has - and it has in the past - the physical supply available is gone completely and if you 10x the price it's still gone, and so if you 10x the price from there maybe some will remain, 100x is a "realistic" price multiplier.
But they're much more likely to just ban private sales of silver instead of letting the price reach 5,000 an ounce.