>>724513180
There's just one problem with your post. Anon didn't mention a dark phallus
4chan Search
12 results for "84a2b0b2f2f3941fdd58b89a2bb36bea"
>>724009467
Come now. Recreational skydiving is a very fun outdoor activity with relatively low safety risk. Same goes for summiting mount everest, but that activity has been so commercialized that it's lost its luster. No need to compare them to the retardation of seriously investing in cs skins.
Come now. Recreational skydiving is a very fun outdoor activity with relatively low safety risk. Same goes for summiting mount everest, but that activity has been so commercialized that it's lost its luster. No need to compare them to the retardation of seriously investing in cs skins.
>>519601830
Forgive me, sir, but I have one question... ah, why are they pushing a working helicopter?
Ah, sir, why was it not flown out?
You see how this is very confusing?
Forgive me, sir, but I have one question... ah, why are they pushing a working helicopter?
Ah, sir, why was it not flown out?
You see how this is very confusing?
>>215994963
Javel?
Javel?
>>515484110
Just one more thing . . . you said there was an insurance policy.
Just one more thing . . . you said there was an insurance policy.
>>515355650
Trump and Starmer's ambassador to the US are in deep shit over Epstein. Suddenly they're off the front page
Trump and Starmer's ambassador to the US are in deep shit over Epstein. Suddenly they're off the front page
>>720233114
One thing I don't get is, if everybody is so active in the threads, then why can't they simply turn on the game for 1 hour while posting, surely it'll increase increase the peak tenfold, completely shutting the whiner down?
One thing I don't get is, if everybody is so active in the threads, then why can't they simply turn on the game for 1 hour while posting, surely it'll increase increase the peak tenfold, completely shutting the whiner down?
>>21575020
>Same menu every day, all year (that burger/soup is 2 weeks old bro)
but how would you know that unless you were going there all the time, and why would you go there all the time unless the food was good?
Are you implying you enjoy eating shit?
>Same menu every day, all year (that burger/soup is 2 weeks old bro)
but how would you know that unless you were going there all the time, and why would you go there all the time unless the food was good?
Are you implying you enjoy eating shit?
>brag about half a million active players
>constantly shilling /epog/
>leaks about struggling to get players
>Realm numbers not dipping 24/7
>constantly shilling /epog/
>leaks about struggling to get players
>Realm numbers not dipping 24/7
>sir, why did you just incriminate yourself and continue to do so? yes, I found out that you did it and how you did it, but all I have is very circumstantial. if it wasn't for your sudden outburst in front of several witnesses just now where you admitted to murdering the victim, well, chances are you would have gotten away with it. it's a funny thing sir. most of my cases conclude that way. at least it makes mrs. columbo happy that I get to go home early.
>>213678119
Well in that case it would have been nice if the movie had like a 15 second scene where they establish that these specific nukes work like that instead of just saying "atomic warheads" and priming the movie viewer to assume they work like regular nukes. Even just alter the line to have the dude say something like "radiation suppressed atomic warheads" and I as viewer would have been on board with the lore. Like sure you as a book reader are on board with the lore and thus have no quarrell with this stuff, but I consider it needlessly vague and misleading to not give that simple specification to the film watcher.
Well in that case it would have been nice if the movie had like a 15 second scene where they establish that these specific nukes work like that instead of just saying "atomic warheads" and priming the movie viewer to assume they work like regular nukes. Even just alter the line to have the dude say something like "radiation suppressed atomic warheads" and I as viewer would have been on board with the lore. Like sure you as a book reader are on board with the lore and thus have no quarrell with this stuff, but I consider it needlessly vague and misleading to not give that simple specification to the film watcher.
>>715424920
those are some good points anon, you sure got me.
Just one more thing....
why did he groom a little girl and had an affair with a little furry boy 10 years younger than him?
those are some good points anon, you sure got me.
Just one more thing....
why did he groom a little girl and had an affair with a little furry boy 10 years younger than him?