>>536167643
No, it's value additive.
Of course I want my game to be super popular, and I will do everything in my power to make it popular, however that's not even a real design goal. It's more like a constraint, by needing to be popular, I am limited in certain ways of what I can do. But the actual passion comes from conveying messages to the game audience. If that communication occurs it's a win. Your job as a game designer is to convey the message to the audience
>>536167796
>post your game.
I don't post frogniggers but the one with the sign saying "the rules are you may not ask this unless your game is attached to the post" comes to mind.

>>718365543
unfucking and unjewing the west.

>>718074012
>get btfo last time by a single youtube playlist
>remake the thread
I hate nu/v/

>>718075306
honestly i wouldn't care as long as they did everything i said in terms of the payment and ownership structure of it. thing is though nobody is going to do that because it would mean they couldnt squeeze the profits like a lemon. I'm not really a good face, but I am committed to the process and identity of the game. someone who was solely motivated by credit and money wouldnt be able to release the game under the conditions needed for its success.

>>714460423
>You were never engaged in earnest in the first place.
yup, that's what i said
>You never had an argument.
i chose not to engage because you wouldn't listen anyway, as evidenced by the first sentence lmao
>You're angry at a childs cartoon that was popular for 12 years straight and is still ongoing.
says who
>There's nothing else to explain.
you can't fathom any explanation because whatever programmed you didn't provide you the script. you're just too dumb to get it. unironically.