>>514917112
>hydrogen bomb
Nukes are as real as the holocaust. The nuke hoax, not the holohoax, is the true lynchpin of the post-war world.
Neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, the “nuke” dropped on Hiroshima would have left 98% of the U235 (half-life 700 million years) intact and spread around the area. To put Hiroshima in perspective, the claimed u235 release would have been ~30% of the u235 released in the Chernobyl disaster. Official narrative is that 100% of this was sucked up into the stratosphere, despite the very low altitude of the “detonation” (1500ft). An absolutely absurd claim.
Neither had increased cancer rates, large longitudinal studies were conducted as cancer rates were (of course) expected to increase after such an attack, yet rates were indistinguishable from baseline.
Neither had circular blast radius, as would be expected.
In Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”
Both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.
