>>82083490
We don't. It's just that we don't like racebait or disingenuous posts. You often find these things in AMWF posts:
>An over generalisation and broad claim like "all white girls want East asian men"
>Then one of the ricecels will spontaneously start claiming out of nowhere that all "WMAF couples are disgusting and produce incels"
>Even though it's a complete non sequitur and out of the blue
>Clearly proving that it wasn't simply about "celebrating love between amwf" but they're doing it specifically to spite white guys
Double standards and all. If a guy posts an image of wmaf stuff on these amwf stuff. The amwf posters will automatically assume the white guys are "mad" just because they posted wmaf stuff without context. But couldn't the same logic apply to the amwf posters?
Just imagine if jeets and nigcels starting doing what the amwf posters do
>Post a collage of white women with browns and blacks
>Then claim something like white women love x group (an broad over generalised claim)
>Or posted images of white women with black men and say "why does this piss off white boys?"
>Then if anyone says it's a faux narrative the jeets and nigcels call them "chuds" and ask bad faith questions
Btw I saw images of East Asian women dating black men. Why do they love black men so much? If you disagree you're just an insecure asian incel chud.
