>>717284862
People like you, even electrical engineers will make this sort of argument without even knowing what or how electricity even functions. They actually believe there's something that travels in the solid copper lines despite no evidence or possibility for such ridiculous shit to occur.
>>717252006
I believe that since they disingenuously started this "argument" by propping up an inert gas as a first sin. In reality you are the carbon they want to remove and them make sure they clarify that with every perfectly fine, functioning energy infrastructure they destroy and erect a non working coping mechanism in its place. It's a grift for materialists and lobbyists to sell your shit government scry mirror material for a premium.