>>514941303
How does this grifter have any subscribers that take him seriously at this point? He's been talking about China's "imminent" collapse for the last 20 years.

>>106261377
My favorite is "Fall of China in 2 Months". His internet defense force try to pretend that video never existed and that "he always predicted 2030 as the collapse date".

Pete's damage control crew now insists that he never said China was going to collapse soon but it would happen around 2030.

>>16726830
If you predict something long enough, eventually it will happen. In Zeihan's case, he's probably going to die before China collapses but maybe in a couple of hundred years, he will be considered a visionary for seeing China's fall centuries ahead of time.

>>509158191
>because China will be collapsed
I your only hop rally a collapsed China?
Don't you have any other outlook in life?

>>16711045
You're down playing his message quite a bit. Any doom scenario said enough times over a long enough period will eventually end up becoming at least somewhat true.

>>509028166
Dude really loves his own face.

>>507432249
No. They exist and you must prove them wrong or OP is right. That's how science works.

If you make a prediction for a long enough time, the odds of it eventually being at least somewhat correct rises above 50%.