>>514712995
you forgot the Homelessness minister kicking tenants to the street

>>514169143
>still watching kikeslop TV and film in 2025
I so hope you guys don't do this.

mata nee

>>513324959
Hey what have you done besides post here today?
For the last week?
Month?

slit their foreskins of all those who insult deliveroons

>>512865847
It's the product of the state taking on the provider role of all people. On the surface it makes sense, as in the past, men would spend all their money they got from work down at the pub, living his wife and kids in destitution. But now the state acts as the father protector, women don't need to offer men anything, and men realize that because of this, there's no bargaining power between them and their spouse. The nation might die because of this, but I think the state will collapse under its debt before that happens.

>>512865847
It's the product of the state taking on the provider role of all people. On the surface it makes sense, as in the past, men would spend all their money they got from work down at the pub, living his wife and kids in destitution. But now the state acts as the father protector, women don't need to offer men anything, and men realize that because of this, there's no bargaining power between them and their spouse. The nation might die because of this, but I think the state will collapse under its debt before that happens.

>>512865847
It's the product of the state taking on the provider role of all people. On the surface it makes sense, as in the past, men would spend all their money they got from work down at the pub, living his wife and kids in destitution. But now the state acts as the father protector, women don't need to offer men anything, and men realize that because of this, there's no bargaining power between them and their spouse. The nation might die because of this, but I think the state will collapse under its debt before that happens.

Midn...

> The Government’s own estimate of the cost of giving away the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius is almost £35bn, according to documents released under the Freedom of Information Act – far higher than the £3.4bn figure Sir Keir has previously used in public.
>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/08/10/revealed-chagos-deal-to-cost-10-times-what-starmer-claimed/

lel

> The Government’s own estimate of the cost of giving away the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius is almost £35bn, according to documents released under the Freedom of Information Act – far higher than the £3.4bn figure Sir Keir has previously used in public.
>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/08/10/revealed-chagos-deal-to-cost-10-times-what-starmer-claimed/

lel