>>724531736
I wish people would stop using this scale with the shit labeling. 2 is not semi-furry. 2 is furry. most anthro characters is 2.

What are your preferred animal people designs?

What’s your preferred anthro level?
1: Has animal ears and maybe a tail at max. Example: Nia from Xenoblade
2: Has more animal traits including having fur in the face, the face must be a flat human-like face with a human nose. Example: Izutsumi from Dungeon Meshi and most Monster Girls
3: Has a human face shape but with a snout instead of a human nose. Example: Most anthro designs are around this tier
4: Has fur styled to look like human hair and face shape is a little less human. Example: Belladona from the Mana series
5: Face shape is mostly animal-like with few human qualities. Example: The Khajiit from Elder Scrolls
6: A straight up animal face. Example: Feral characters

>>534002661
2 is furry. Check the face, if it stays to human it isn’t furry. Here’s a better chat.

1 is a human with cat ears
2 is a human with cat ears and face fur, this is basically monster girl tier
3 is a mix of human and animal facial structure, the face shape of a human but with a snout instead of a human nose.
4 leans more into the animal face with fur styled to be like human hair and a less human face structure
5 has a face that is animal like with minimal human qualities
6 is a straight up animal face

1 is kemonomimi tier
2 is monster girl tier
3, 4 and 5 are furry
6 is feral

What's the ideal bros

>>3777912
>taking that chart seriously
No one actually uses that chart and 2 is in no way semi-furry.

Meanwhile pretty much places like /aco/ and even e621 use the face as the ultimate indicator.