>>16724913
>moon far away, therefor, must be hard for to geet theree
No. Wrong.
Once you have the thrust to weight bit solved the rest is trivial.
>but we can't do it today without them tipping over!
You're talking about manned flight by an ace pilot in vaccum (trivially easy/safe once you're used to it compared to the wild unpredictability of atmospheric flight) vs a machine that can't be trained on the environment its going to actually operate in.
>but radiation! micrometeorites!
we have had probes in deep space for decades and they're fine. the meteor meme is like questioning how someone could survive a swim in the ocean without being eaten by a great white. space is very very empty.
>but the calculations, they didn't have no computers!
they didn't even need the computers they did have. once you leave atmosphere every calculation you need could be done by a HS student. vacuum flight doesn't have many variables. any errors can be corrected by the crew.
the flight to/the landing on the moon isn't the impressive bit. its getting that big fucker into space. after that, you could probably do it.