>>542784934
>neat triangle picture
What's it called when you don't know why something is wrong but you take their idea to it's logical conclusion and it demonstrate that it's obviously flawed in that case?
Example:
>"Criminalizing Marijuana is good because it lets police incarcerate dangerous criminals when otherwise there wouldn't be enough evidence to convict for the greater crime"
>"Well why not make drinking water illegal, that way the police can always arrest the dangerous criminals?"