>>513684393
Liberals and leftists are closer to "the good guys" because rightwing politics are fundamentally more tribal and nepotistic. Rightwing purple prose set around "what's so bad about uplifting your family" is really the best they can do at forming an argument as to why they should be tolerated when essentially their pitch amounts to calling killing your neighbors and taking their stuff and removing them as rivals the key to success. That's why at it's best it's cryptofascist, a set of policies that aren't overtly rightwing. Leftwing policy can be more overt because protecting people and being fair is easier to explain. Rightwing hierarchy and policy to protect and serve that nepo hierarchy can't honestly be justified, you either need noble lies, myths, or eugenicist blood and soil appeals that further isolates you and makes you a target.

>>513311273
Patriotism means loving what your country can be. Believing things can be better for people makes self sacrifice worth it. You likely lack the intelligence to see the bigger picture and focus on short term satisfaction and protection like the right does.

>>149757911
That study shows the right is tribal and the left is more considerate. It's not controversial or big. You're dumb for thinking this is a gotcha.

>>149688067
>republicans in charge of understanding anything
Not gonna work

>>510719550
Because "he good boy, he dindu nuffin" is rightwing mentality. There's an idea that you actually need to defend and stick by your own out of survival. On the left where the mentality zooms out further to a global collective mindset that wants to ensure fairness, you rat on your family, you cancel them and hope everyone does the same. Rightwing tribalism is better at creating a mass delusion to protect tribal power. Just look at the Christian zionist "bless Israel so we will be blessed" line of reasoning. It's insane, but they will say it proudly on national television.

>>509752385
The cruelty being cheered on by the right reveals the core of their rightwing thought: politics is purely self serving and cruelty isn't just permitted, it is supported with an open degree of enjoyment. You can find edgy lefties, but you won't find them in government. In government you find support for Alligator Alcatraz memes and blatant lies about immigrant eating dogs and cats in Springfield. It's hardly political, it's just cruelty and hatred coming directly from government. That same rightwing turning around to be hurt by an edgy lefty post. Reveals the nature of their cruelty and sensitivity; it isn't that they're generally cruel, they're selectively sensitive. They see their in group as fundamentally different on a human level. This how slavery was permitted, how genocide is permitted. It's not a gotcha, this isn't mind blowing, but even Jordan Peterson isn't shy about telling people they would be nazis in 1940s Germany. The difference is that rightwing thought and JP see the nazis and rightwing violence as blameless, a force of nature. It's the lefty cucks standing against that nature who are wrong. Again, not a gotcha, just a fundamental of left vs right.

>>509425447
You can have differing opinions about gender shit and still be left. Or did the study say otherwise? Why doesn't the study get quoted or posted?

>>509429046
But the right isn't open minded, they're consistently more isolationist and tribal. Even that heat map meme is about how the right doesn't even extend considerations beyond their tribe. See pic.

>>509430956
>parroting emotional talking points
The right believed cats and dogs were being eaten in Springfield despite the lack of evidence. The disagreements on the right are that of a white nationalist, a Muslim jihadist, and a zionist IDF.

>>509361611
>>509362333
The right is more ingroup and tribal.

>>509204975
Is rightwing ideological narcissism? People like Jordan Peterson have been working to define narcissism in the left as being an activist of sorts in that the assumption is that they don't truly believe in their cause, there isn't a logical way to disagree with an establishment or criticism of it to exist, so it must be that they only are activists as an accessory. It relies heavily on mind reading, but also your level of confidence in what you believe. When the left is criticized in that way, it comes from a place of disagreement becasue rightwing activists aren't classified the same way. Or maybe they believe the correctness is beside the point, the motive, the reason to take action, is purely self promotional.

To arrive at those conclusions relies on logical leaping and assumptions, you put in work. On the right, it's as simple as pointing out that they keep voting for Trump. Is Trump a narcissist? Why does that not ever enter their conversions on the topic? The answer is that to them, the narcissist diagnosis was just a means to an end; not engaging with the substance of what's being supporter or opposed and instead address the motives of why anyone would take that stance and focus on that.

>>507618323
>moral allocations
As in the extent of how much you care about right or wrong done to things. The right is more tribal and fine with others being exploited, the left is bleeding heart to the point of caring about animal rights.

>>507260231
That pic got dropped because it just shows that the right don't care about people outside themselves. It's asking you to measure thr extent of how you care about right or wrong done, not what you prioritize.

>>507099593
That graph is about caring about right or wrong done to groups outside your own. It isn't about priority.