>>535136781
The funny thing is that DD2 has a much better LOD and clearer visuals despite both being extremely similar on the same engine developed by the same company.

So why does Wilds suffer from open world and look so shit while DD2 looks pretty nice despite both being on the same engine?

>>528745490
I'm honestly not even sure how they fucked up though - DD2 might also have performance issues, but it looks pretty good. So at least it has an excuse for that. Wilds however doesn't. Furthermore, DD2 has actual view distance.
They're both basically the same game, big monster killing open world sword fightan games.
So what the fuck happened?

>>712422378
I don't know about every one else, but for me;
>1. Dragon's Dogma Dark Arisen (I also liked DD2)
>2. Nioh 1 and 2 (And now 3, the beta was sick)
>3. Witcher 1 (I also like 2 and 3, but 1 was my favorite)
>4. Natural Selection 2
>5. Monster Hunter series (Yes, I love all of it)
Though I don't know if I'd even consider myself wholly right wing. I'm definitely conservative, but I hate big corporations and big pharma and big government but I also see the government as a necessity even if I don't wholly agree with them.