>>719078921
That's what I was wondering. Youtuber, streamers etc barely talk about it nor share content
Most Zelda threads I see are basically the same obvious 45 yo Zeldafags artificially trying to keep their threads alive through bait
With snoy besides the CoD and fifa buyers I don't see people caring about the other ips (already dead or disgusting to look at like intergalactic), but I feel like Nintendo fandom can't let go when their childhood games get less threads than some modern games (there was some Nintendo mod constantly removing threads that weren't even gachas), it's just that tokt caught my attention because the numbers feel absolutely inflated as fuck for the lack of presence online, will they claim the next Zelda sales to be 45 millions or something?

>>718420514
Controversy marketing thread

>>718336308
I fucking swear Zeldafags do that a lot

>>715967667
Controversy threads are paid marketing threads anon. Just like some Vtumor was caught larping as a hate to keep his Vtranny relevant but he forgot that chan had ids.
Shills get paid per thread, it doesn't matter if it's hater thread, like when Ubisoft pretends their games were leaked or Neil Cuckmann shills Tlou/his new globina game

>>715585129
Nintendo indians are losing catalogue space to shill Nintendo products, it's why you won't see let's say fromfags or capcomfags giving a shit about gacha but 8 gacha threads mean less space for Peach, Samus, Zelda poke furry threads, see
>>715600995
>>715594542
>>715578329
It's always the same hourly threads, but those threads die fast unless they samefag so instead of accepting people don't want to engage their childhood games they keep making threads as soon as the others die.
Then you have feminist western developers seething at chinks being smarter by making more money with less graphics just because of fanservice, and like 2 generation of women hitting the premenopause while the average man quit and is busy with games or any other hobby

>>715548890
>Please talk about Zelda