>>213635436
Your point isn't wrong. But again, I just think Europe's peoples are so mixed that these distinctions lose much of their meaning, they were Vikings, then French, and later even English. That's what European peoples are: all connected and blended together.

Since Latin disappeared, who could possibly claim to be its "true successor"? Even linguists can't say, why? Because each language evolved in its own way. That's what European peoples are. identities are blurry, and No one can truly claim ownership over an ancient language or culture.

>>213635587
Ah… dude, why are you taking it that way? When I said disappeared, I meant that the peoples and nations who spoke Latin as their mother tongue are gone. You know

You guys act like Trump is playing 4D chess, but this H-1B policy just makes him look like a petty manchild.

India didn't side with him on some irrelevant issue, so he throws a tantrum and sabotages your tech industry out of spite? That's not leadership. That's emotional damage control.

Americans keep whining about Indians taking your jobs, but the truth is no one in your country even wants to study STEM or work 60-hour weeks for low pay. You gave up, they didn't. That's why your CEOs keep choosing them.

Honestly, from outside the US, it just looks like lazy boomers and bitter NEETs crying because immigrants outcompeted them

>>213510653
You say "we've been voting for less immigration for 20 years!!" and blame the govt for not carrying out the public's will. But it's not just about votes or slogans.

Govt have to balance economic needs with public opinion, and the fact is that without immigrants, many essential sectors would collapse.
People avoid hard jobs and aren't having enough kids to replace the workforce, so immigrants are the only ones stepping in.

Before blaming the govt as the scapegoat, remember, you've set so many fires yourselves that there's now a shortage of water. The govt is just borrowing water from neighboring towns to keep the flames from spreading further.

>>512295401
You call it a choice, but it's really a veiled threat

>

That's not love, that's control dressed as mercy. Declaring someone guilty just for not agreeing with you isn't divine justice, it's cosmic authoritarianism.

>>512221203
You're doing Olympic level mental gymnastics to dodge the point lel

Galileo didn’t have to be an atheist crusader to threaten Church authority, his ideas did that just fine