>>76537270
>shameful
>redemption
>respectable
You're so weak you can't even lift those spooks away

>>213991784
Trve

Was Stirner the peak of the edgelordist current or did anyone manage to surpass him?

>>24639116
>Class

>>531679964
>Nasu saw how dumb zoomers (and adults like Gachasmack) were when they complained and moaned about Amphoreus being too long.
>knew these types would get filtered by pre-Camelot fgo or the FSN prologue.
>Also, TM and Hoyo also had to agree on stuff that would respect HSR and Fate, resulting in a very accessible story for fans of both ip's, which that's the point of a collab.
>people still bitch that the story was too short and simple, like Penacony

The cycle repeats lol.

>>280539751
A spook

>>24532268
>>24532257
Cowards. Writing in a book is an authentic act - it's the physical manifestation of the phenomenon of learning, i.e. making the content of the article one's own. It's a physical marking of a new territory, an adversarial act against the author - the reader knows better what belongs in the book. Just as the physical copy of the book is his now, the content inside is his too: both physically and psychologically.

He is correct, why do you care about the white race or the west dying?

You're going to be dead before it becomes uninhabitable from all the shitskins.

i dont understand how would society and civilization and scientific or artistic progress function or even happen if everyone is a egoist individualist who act entirely according to their own will and interests, unconstrained by social norms or external authorities

Just do what you want, anon

>you are not allowed to do this because it’s a spook
>you are not allowed to believe this because it’s a spook
>you are not allowed to practice this because it’s a spook
What a complete hypocrite. Following this guy seems to be the most limiting no-fun-allowed thing, since you are trapped in a prison of spooks in your very attempt at trying to avoid being spooked. I can’t believe anyone is retarded enough to listen to this hack, especially since he is just ripping off Marquis De Sade and just removing all the references to sexual degeneracy. Stirner’s philosophy will never lead to socialism ever, because as soon as a group of people can fuck other people up and get away with it they will. Bullies will always exist, plenty of animals will favour their own needs when they can but I don't see them practicing socialist equality. Any slight advantage will be used, and do you seriously think that people without a certain advantage will be able to stand against a group or groups of people who teamed up with each other because they have an advantage and can easily exploit others together? You know what you get when people follow Stirner? Mexican cartels, because ain’t nobody stopping Mexican cartels with the power of their ego. Just sell people crack and then boom, the ego wants crack more than they want the integrity of the society that would ban it, the ego wants to sell crack more than they want the integrity of the society that bans it. Also, prison is another example of why Stirner’s philosophy doesn’t lead to socialism