>>535871979
>I don't see people mention it as much
yeah i can't believe it hasn't been brought up much over and over and over and over again

>>715851703
that picture seriously represents the actual attitude of snk marks
who genuinely argued their support for SMALLER rosters, LESS content (especially no to single player content), and preferred the weak ass graphics of snk games to something more polished "so as to avoid casualslop fans invading their fanbase"

and then they act confused when nobody wants to play their games

>>531455982
you should just check the archives and investigate 9k sales

>>17995304
he's like an snk game
there's some good gameplay in there (arguable) but there's nothing to pop for

>>712418770
i don't mind cuts as long as it's because you aren't recycling absolutely anything, that includes animations
because some companies love to recycle content from previous games and STILL fail to meet the previous game's launch roster size, begging the question, what the fuck did recycling benefit in expediting anything if you still held off content to make us pay twice for it, dickweed

not that i'm talking about any company in particularcoughsnkcoughkofxvcough