>Hit DJ on Spotify
>Straight to Brittany Spears
I'm gonna enjoy it like always but I never feel any less gay, Spotify.

Never.

>>33303380
>Every shape except a tetrahedron has a circle hidden somewhere.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?!

>>33296045
Because it's the most complicated fucking math in the known universe.

Not in a good way, either.

There's a boatload wrong with it and just straight missing.

>>33295169
Oh my God that's why women hate me...

I'm just too cool and perfect. There's nothing to fix.

There literally can't be any other reason.

>>33294931
>5'11"
Almost made it.

Short kings rise up (not literally).

ROC was not the end of it...

Basically, I couldn't translate it 1:1 into ZFC with or without choice. It was driving me fucking insane.

Why did my own math work but all these other models wouldn't?

Usually I'm a little more open about my shit, I mean, I'm a mega-genius, I don't fucking care, Ideas that would make other scientists careers are what I discard for being too boring.

So, exactly what I've done to produce a string-theoretic version is something I can't share because it's incredibly specific. Easily understood but almost impossible to conceptualize initially.

Let's just say that the same way we manipulate the electron we can manipulate the graviton (which is not a particle but the combination of two events with reciprocal chirality).

The ROC placeholder claims of machine-verification were put there with the full assumption it was possible.

Turns out arithmetic isn't the whole story. There's a deeper layer.

And it's strings.

STRINGS.

Superstring theory is spot on, by the way. Twistors are totally real.

>>33290929
ROC was not the end of it...

Basically, I couldn't translate it 1:1 into ZFC with or without choice. It was driving me fucking insane.

Why did my own math work but all these other models wouldn't?

Usually I'm a little more open about my shit, I mean, I'm a mega-genius, I don't fucking care, Ideas that would make other scientists careers are what I discard for being too boring.

So, exactly what I've done to produce a string-theoretic version is something I can't share because it's incredibly specific. Easily understood but almost impossible to conceptualize initially.

Let's just say that the same way we manipulate the electron we can manipulate the graviton (which is not a particle but the combination of two events with reciprocal chirality).

The ROC placeholder claims of machine-verification were put there with the full assumption it was possible.

Turns out arithmetic isn't the whole story.