>>508971616
Everyone is on the same side depending on how you frame things.
One example is how the left and the zionist right are on the same side in the sense that they both push the narrative that israel is an asset to anglo/euro nations, in contrast to the anglo/euro right which pushes the narrative that israel is a liability.
Another example is how the left and the capitalist right are on the same side in the sense that they both support open borders and mass migration into anglo/euro nations, in contrast to the anglo/euro right which opposes open borders and mass migration.
Of course the left and the zionist right differ in *why* they push the same narrative, the left and the capitalist right differ in *why* they support the same border policies, but the why is immaterial, so from a materialist perspective (which is how most of the left and capitalist right think) they should be considered the same faction when discussing these particular issues.
There seems to be a missing quadrant on the israel question though:
Zionist right => courts pro-white supporters + claims israel is an asset to whites.
White right => courts pro-white supporters + claims israel is a liability to whites.
Left => courts anti-white supporters + claims israel is an asset to whites.
??? => courts anti-white supporters + claims israel is a liability to whites.
The most obvious form for this missing faction to take would be an anti-white faction that understands that israel is harmful to white interests and thus seeks to empower the israel lobby in the west as a means to undermine weaken whites. Does such a faction exist? Maybe russia/china/etc could have some factions in this quadrant, although their motives would be more anti-western in a geopolitical sense rather than anti-white in the sense of how the conflict typically plays out at home.
