BF6 is fun, but like 80% of the buildings on the city map can't be destroyed, was it like this in other battlefields too? I remember in BC2 almost every single building could be leveled

conquest maps feel way too tiny and fast paced

it's like that in all the post bc2 battlefields. But to be fair BC2 had smaller maps with not as many buildings on them, and they were also copy pasted from one another.

other battlefields had like 5 buildings per map

What's the difference between conquest and breakthrough?

leveling every building doesn't make for good gameplay, BC2 was the only game that did it

>>717505827
i am in queue for breakthrough rn but its probably that "push" style mode where you alternate between being attacked and defender, like in bf1, p simple

>>717505827
Conquest is an open map where both teams compete over locations. Breakthrough is direct attack and defense.

>>717505607 (OP)
>200m giga budget AAAA game cant have proper destruction despite being known for destruction
>the 20 developers who left DICE a few years ago managed to create a game where the entire city is 100% destructible in the finals
what causes this?

>>717505887
its fun

>>717506518
play red faction or whatever destruction tech demo is hot these days

>>717505752
Agreed, but I am enjoying the game way more than any BF between BF4 and now.

>>717505949
Competency Crisis.
Result of 10+ years of non merit based hiring.

>>717505887
>>717506623
only in conquest, in rush it was perfect because you had new areas to destroy

>>717505949
>maps the size of a city with vehicles vs maps the size of a field that's 100% infantry.
retard

>>717505607 (OP)
destructible environments were massively scaled back after BC2 and basically never came back, in any genre.

>>717506892
>only in conquest
Aka the only mode that matters.

>>717506840
incorrect, all of their DEI devs went to work on the finals and the anti-BFV devs worked on 2042

>>717505607 (OP)
Seems superficial from what I have seen too, does the building fully collapse or is it just the walls fall down.
Seems kinda useless and actually gives the enemies in the building the advantage because they now have a higher FOV to shoot from when before they were restricted to the angles they could see out the window.

>>717505949
I don't actually mind Cashout but it's criminal that The Finals is built around 3v3v3(v3).

>>717506949
It's not good anymore since CoD copied it

>>717506840
It’s crazy how they essentially recreated similar destruction to Pearl Market map from BF4 and introduce it as revolutionary destruction.
All the destruction is scripted, it’s like BF4 levolution’s lame cousin.

>>717507024
>caring about what CoD did

>>717505607 (OP)
>in BC2 almost every single building could be leveled
it was the same small building copy pasted all over the map

played 90 mins and had enough fun

just another one of those recent battlefields where you run around like a tard as a medic and play cod on tiny maps

>I remember in BC2 almost every single building could be leveled
that's because BC2 had like 5 buildings on the map

>>717507140
has a larger roster of firearms, vehicles, maps, amd killstreaks

>>717505607 (OP)
In BF:BC2, it was the opposite. Nearly everything could either be outright destroyed, or the building (if big enough to not kersplode in one rocket) would take multiple hits before caving in on itself.

The only indestructible things were objectives (flagpoles, crates with the bomb inside, etc) and foundations for buildings.

>>717507471
>caring about what call of duty has

>>717507494
it was pure kino. the last stand of your team would be fought on a literal ww1 battlefield with nothing but ruined buildings around.

nu-dice could never

Are you a paid shill or something? This is the 4th thread glazing this game in under 1hr.
Looks like trash to me but you do you op.

it's a design issue and not a tech issue because you don't your players to run out cover and structures halfway though the game.

>>717507593
>why are people making threads about biggest new games instead of gatca slop

>>717507593
they have been doing it all week since the MP reveal. definitely paid.

is m320 in the game? It was poop in BF4

>>717507593
>>717508007
i just got access to the early beta today so I'm playing it, so are 100 000+ people
fucks wrong with you retards

>high school me played Red Faction Guerilla and BF:BC2, excited for destructible environment's future in gaming
>literally 0 games had destruction after this
Why?

>>717505607 (OP)

>>717508149
>literally 0 games had destruction after this
design issue
and normies don't really cares, so why would you spend all that money making a good destruction system

People are more worried about this game being a COD killer than a good Battlefield game. That’s all I need to know to not buy this game.

how do you play the beta

>>717508431
thats because bf has been dead since bf1 and cod is still relevant

You can get play the beta from steam? What do you need the twitch drop key for?

>>717508431
BF6 is copying warzone 1 to 1 down to veichle physics.

>>717508490
open beta is in 2 days on the 9th, im playing early access cause I applied for it like months ago
you can also get codes for early access from twitch, or just wait until the 9th
>>717508506
you can download it but you can't get ingame for now unless u have early access shit on ur account

>>717505887
>leveling every building doesn't make for good gameplay
bait

Why are the maps so small?

How's the performance for you? It's buttery smooth for me.

wow bf2042 bros we are so back!!!

game looks like dogshit unfortunately

>>717506893
the maps are small as fuck in battlefield 6 what are you talking about

>>717508736
its great for me, ultra preset, same shit as bf1 pretty much, but i have a i7 12700k, rtx 4070, 32gb ram, and i assume dlss is on, but it looks fine, I hear worse specs people are struggling

>>717505949
>the 20 developers who left DICE a few years ago managed to create a game where the entire city is 100% destructible in the finals

??

>>717508761
No where near as small and confined as the finals.

This game feels like the shitty fast food restaurants rebranding their stores for a modern look after McDonald’s did so.

>>717508736
100fps on most maps, 70fps on the snowy mountain one, usin a 3070ti and some intel cpu i dnt remember. 1440p with dlss. i wish i got more but it's playable, can't complain

>>717505607 (OP)
It's a consequence of trying to marry bf3 with bad company 2, every BC2 map was designed around it's destruction model and here is seems totally random, each building responds to explosives in a different manner which breaks the illusion.

>>717509009
>i wish i got more
lower the graphics

>>717505887
Good gameplay is fun gameplay, leveling buildings and consistent/total destructibility is fun, BC2 is fun, BC2 has the best gameplay. You people always over exaggerate the effect collapsing buildings had on the map, they were well designed enough to work even when everything was destroyed, it just shifted tactics mid combat and kept the game fresh.

Does BF6 have good reload animations? That's all I care about.

>>717507893
I only found out the other day the guy that made teardown is some giga-genius who made it to flex his cool new physics engine.
I'd never really looked at the game and assumed it was indie minecraft slop.

>>717508831
shouldnt be an issue considering they have 20x the budget

>>717509254
No

>>717509337
Really? That's disappointing

>PS3 graphics
>Named soldiers
>Less maps than BF4 (2013 PS3 game)
>Less weapons than BF4
>Maps are small as shit
>No recoil
>Weapons don't sound like weapons
>Soldiers move like crazy even tho they have like 100 kg of gear on them
>No server browser
>Aim assist
>Battlepass
>Bots in servers
>Female soldiers
>No artillery
>Worse destruction than BFBC2 (2010 PS3 game)

>>717509282
Good thing you're not a game designer.

>>717509254
It’s a knock off animations of MW2019, in fact the whole game is a knock off of MW2019. Even Conquest feels like fucking Ground War.

>>717507003
They have 3 other 5v5 modes now

>>717508827
The Finals is the name of the game. It's like a natural progression from Battlefield and as such is the better game to play

>>717509420
you know not every map/wep etc is available for the beta right kek

It's pretty good so far, I like it.

>>717509216
didn't seem to do much,i think i'm cpu bottlenecked maybe idk

>>717509578
Well mw19 animations will never be matched or beaten so I don't expect them to be THAT good, but jank reload animations really pull me out of the experience. I guess infinity ward is hoarding Hyper all to themselves.

>>717509420
why are you spamming that?

>>717509635
And your point is?

>>717506949
Rush is a better mode than conquest, the issue is rush only truly worked in BC because that is what it was built for. The destructibility is a natural part of the ramping pressure that builds on the defending side before the target is destroyed and the tension resets in a new area, this was never replicated in subsequent rush modes because they fucked up the formula and removed destructibility among other things. Now rush just ends in the same meatgrinder stale mates that conquest does except there's less room to flank.

The Egypt map feels like a generic UE5 asset flip. Liberation Peak feels like it Medal of Honor 2010 and World War 3 had a baby.

>>717509585
>They have 3 other 5v5 modes now
Yeah that's still too tiny for me two bee haitch.

Are there maps as big as Golmud Rail?

>>717509789
>Rush
Sorry I just don't enjoy your dog shit search and destroy meat funnel mode.

>>717509789
>The destructibility is a natural part of the ramping pressure that builds on the defending side before the target is destroyed and the tension resets in a new area
So that's why I enjoyed BC1/2 rush mode so much. Never were able to put the finger on the why.

If anyone is having trouble getting a twitch key just keep watching, it'll pop up in your notification eventually, took me an hour

>>717509462
>being able to destroy every building in 10-20 minute matches is bad because..... IT JUST IS!!!
i understand the argument for open world story shit but why would it be bad for battlefield of all games lmao

Toggle or ADS?

>>717509420
You forgot
>Muh snappy operator screenshake while reloading
I hate it so much.

>>717509938
Because you only played it in the shitty battlefield games. When it turned into a meat grinder in bad company you got creative and strapped a bunch of C4 to a helicopter, rammed it into the objective building and blew it up to try and collapse it on the target.

>>717509789
Rush was good in the Bad Company games because the maps were designed for it. BF3 only had Tehran Highway, Operation Metro, and Damavand Peak for Rush designed maps. BF4 and beyond didn't take Rush into any consideration when they designed the maps.

>>717510061
>Destroying every building in a map filled with Heli Niggers, jet niggers and tank niggers
Yeah good thing you aren't a game designer.

>>717510110
ADS, never ever toggle, clunk

>>717510126
Bad Company 2 is one of those "shitty BF games", it sucked in BF3, it sucked in BF4 and it was mediocre in BC2.

>>717505607 (OP)
at some point they had to choose between visual fidelity/detail and fully destroyable meshes, and it looks like the compromise they settled on is limiting full destruction to some structures but not others. losing the BFBC2 destructiom is just another casualty of the industry's obsession with chasing graphics over gameplay.

>>717505607 (OP)
last bf game was shit
before last bf game was shit
before before last bf game was shit
before before before last bf game was shit
before before before before last bf game was shit

do you see a pattern here? it's a dead franchise there's no sense in bringing it up on v. go find better shooters there's plenty of those

yeah people dont realize just how small and shitty bc2 maps were. they were made for ps3 in mind which only has 256mb of ram.

Why the fuck are maps SO SMALL, I thought this was going to be more traditional BF?

>>717510303
BF 1 was amazing

>>717510307
2142 was the last decent one
BC2 was only good in few of it's maps
>>717510338
assuming you mean 1942 yes

>another thing that /v/ vehemently hates
Surprise surprise. It's like a broken record.

>>717510338
especially the zepellin mode
that game looked so fucking beautiful too, like to this day the graphics blow me away, they rly hit the nail on the head on that one
>inb4 salty about black soldiers or ww1 "Realism" or something
I DON'T CARE

>>717510338
should i get bF1?

The best BF mode is the Titan mode. There, I said it. A shame it never came back.

>>717510326
There's going to be bigger maps they even showed firestorm is coming back. These ones are pretty small though and I hope there's some decent middle to larger maps.

>>717510456
yes, its dirt cheap on key sites and still has tons of players, worth

>>717510425
we dont hate it it's just that this game being shit is the easiest /v/ prediction ever the company hasnt released a good game in more than a decade

at most its somewhat annoying that threads discussing real games are dying because someone wants to talk about dice slop #89213

>>717510484
Overrated futuristicslop mode.

>>717510132
>tanks shouldnt be able to destroy brick walls
lmao

>>717510271
>obsession with chasing graphics
it looks terrible thoughever

>>717510130
It's not just the maps, every aspect of rush was designed around bad company's systems, I have accepted it will never work as well so long as the focus of these games is split between conquest and rush.

So how can I play today? I don't use twitch

>>717505607 (OP)
battlebit showed that full destruction is bad
in the end the map just turns into flat open garbage

do you still need to install origin to play a bf game

>operatordrewski shitting on the sliding
>says it needs to be toned down by 50% and the sliding is straight from 2042
Good. Zoomzooms need to die

>>717510801
that is an excuse for poor map design, poor destruction physics, and poor round type design

>>717510837
what
there's basically no sliding

needs more destruction and the DMR feels weak af
3 headshots or 3 bodyshots to kill?
should be 2 headshots or 1 headshot 1 bodyshot, or 3 body shots
also performance is ok but wish it was better
>tfw on am4 and 5800x3d have the BIS cpu and would need a full mobo replacement to upgrade
1440p max settings and pulling 150-200 fps so shouldn't complain but wish i could get 300+
game feels p fucking good so far, having fun
thanks for reading my blogpost fags

>>717510801
They should just add the ability to repair building even if it looks goofy

>>717510801
That's why they invented rush and why they implemented features like explosions creating craters in the ground that you can hide in, it is also why they designed maps around the idea that everything would be destroyed so the natural landscape worked with or without buildings. You can't half ass destruction but every game after bad company does.

sprintslop

>>717505607 (OP)
whats performance like?

>>717505607 (OP)
I won't play it unless they have fired all the feminists and faggots that made BFV

>>717510989
Germans will exclusively play as construction workers

>>717511051
great for me >>717508801

>>717505607 (OP)
BC2 was the last good Battlefield

>>717510801
Destroyed buildings shouldnt be flat. Sounds like a shitty game.

>>717511051
solid, >>717510971

EU /v/ hours are so fucking gay I hate you faggots

only CS sweatlords hate destruction because they can't memorize all their hyper meta peak points if you can just lob an HE shell at it and make it useless.

>>717505607 (OP)
>tfw they'll never remake Enemy Territory
mogs all of these dogshit games

>>717510703
Looks good to me... too bad for the gameplay.

Unironically one of the most optimized games of this console generation, but that's mainly because every other pile of shit is on UE5.

>>717511239
gameplay is good tho, shooting feels rly good, rpgs are fun as fuck to use

guys i dont think bf should have tanks

>>717511358
nta but rpgs and blowing up tanks feels fucking GOATed, but the rpgs feel weak as shit against infantry
like you can hit 10 ft away from someone and do 30 damage

This game is pure goykibble aimed to pleas CoD and prime up their Battle Royale. How can they not get it right after fumbling the bag for a fucking DECADE. ALL They had to do was put modern graphics with a modern backend and have BF3's game flow.

>>717511415
what? feels pretty fucking good to me, they 1hit on direct impact and the travel is super fast, almost no drop
if anything im afraid they'll nerf the rpg a lot
they'll def nerf the ammo, 5 rockets is way too much

>>717511439
>ALL They had to do was put modern graphics with a modern backend and have BF3's game flow.

Why is this so hard for them

>>717511471
yeah kills on direct impact but it's a fucking grenade and does barely any splash damage
absolutely love that you get 5 rockets, hopefully they wont nerf but if they do it would feel shitty to have any less than 3 bare minimum
feels great against vehicles tho just not infantry

>>717511564
I hope they add the ump45 from bc2, i loved that
and the tracer dart gun for helis
i love playing engineer, nothing more satisfying in BF than blowing up a vehicle and cooking like 6 clowns in thbere

>>717511239
>Looks good to me

>>717511653
The UMP40 is in and so is the rracer dart gun, however that is now a gadget for the support instead of a sidearm.

>>717510456
It's on sale + the DLC for $4 right now

>>717511703
Is that supposed to look bad? Maybe I'm just not as much of a graphics nigger as everyone else. Seems like a zoomer issue if I'm being honest.

>>717511653
There's a .40 UMP in the files. Weird choice since .40 SW seems to be widely regarded as a meme these days but hey.

>>717507893
Maybe part that, but also part that you can't make a really engaging level if every building has to be fully destructible. The maps in BC2 were nearly as diverse as in subsequent games, lots of little village-type areas with copy paste buildings making them up.

>>717509275
Definitely not minecraft slop. It's a simple arcade game that plays like a destruction sandbox meets time trial racer. It's pretty fun but nothing game-changing in terms of gameplay. It can be pretty challenging and rewards creativity.

>>717511806
>>717511725
nice

>>717511410
COD kids are retards

>>717511781
Thats Crysis 2 from 2011.

>>717511653
>ump45
>asval
>beretta 1301
>mcx spear
would be fucking KINO adds

>>717511827
>weren't nearly* as destructible

why can i barely hold 60fps on a 3060 ti at 1440p on low settings with dlss on? the recommended requirements state that it should hold 60 on high

>>717511806
>no mcx spear
fuck

>>717505887
BC2 also doesn't really have urban maps. I think you could level out the entire village in Sinar Desert in BF1.

>>717505607 (OP)
Just bring back the true Battlefield 1942/Vietnam/2/2142

>>717511912
>>717511980
I think you should look up what the XM7 is.
Val is probably out because of the fixed suppressor. Though they had it in previous games and just made it fixed so maybe it will happen at some point. Or they could just put a vikhr in instead, those are very similar.

>>717507593
>People talking about a new videogame from a popular franchise in a videogame board must be paid shills
Sometimes I forget how utterly retarded some of you are

>>717512108
>XM7
based missed that
also would be cool to add russki and chink factions

destruction fags be like: "the perfect map!"

>>717512312
at 50 tickets left? hell yeah

>>717512312
yes

>>717505752
it's very cod-like

>>717510559
NTA, stop being a disingenuous faggot. From a gameplay perspective having entire cities be nothing but rubble with very little cover and no interior spaces to move around in would get obnoxious real quick. You're just too fucking retarded to understand that, hence why it's good your aren't a game designer.

>>717512312
Yes?

>People falling for paid shilling
let the threads die
ignore them
stop replying.

>>717510110
toggle

>>717512457
lol see >>717512462

>Go to turn on Secure Boot
>Secure Variable Update is locked down
>to fix it you need to update bios but dont update it too much or it still wont work :)
aorus b550

>>717512495
150k people are playing the beta just on PC currently, is it really that shocking to you that some would make /v/ threads in regards to it? just how retarded are you

>>717512457
destruction is good
you're being a faggot

>>717510271
It's not about graphics. The fact is that making the entire environment fully destructible means that there won't BE an environment by the end of it. All the cover's blown away and you're left with a boring wasteland that gets you picked off constantly.

>>717505887
bc2 was the most fun i've had in any battlefield lol!

>>717512312
Look at how small the people are there is tons of cover there created by the destruction, you could absolutely work around it.

>>717512312
>>717512312
yes

how baddly has it been fortnitified?

>>717512635
the finals does destruction fine

>>717512635
hide in the rubble and ruins?

>>717512636
>all maps basically tunnels since it was designed for Rush
>no jets
>the start of dogshit Heli controls

bros I just had a "holy this this is battlefield" moment
rubble was raining down on all sides around me from the building while I was shotgun clearing a trench of enemies and a fucking heli crashed on top of the clusterfuck and I was still alive

I'm thinkin' we're back
also iberian offensive > egypt
haven't played the 3rd map yet

>>717512312
Basically Hell Let Loose maps, FUAK YEA

>>717511056
What were they thinking?

>>717512619
>normies are playing the game!!!!!!

nigger stop falling for slop

>>717513074
4chan is the normie imageboard at this point
of course the video game board would be discussing the currently most popular shooter
retard

lmao this shit is trash, glad they are doing an open beta because i'm not buying this shit

>>717512312
Uh. Yeah. I want the map to look like a fucking war took place. I don't want there to be any place to hide

>>717512619
over 300k

>>717509585
>It's like a natural progression from Battlefield
Are you retarded? It's a carbon copy of call of duty with faggot bells and whistles

it actually feels like bad company 1 multiplayer for me idk why

>>717511410

COD streamers have always been a mistake.

>>717511410
the horde of CODsissie and fortnite-zoomers will destroy the game

>>717513629
saw a clip of some halfbreed retard streamer complaining that they spent 2 hours messing with settings and that the devs should simplify the settings because they're too complicated or some shit
like how the fuck? just adjust your sens and map your keybinds and fuck off into the game
i hope they don't listen to the feedback from those fucking rubes

>>717512312
but i love immersive war settings

>Enter Firing Range
>Get jumpscared by 2042 Dying Whales Soundtrack
>Followed immediately by BF3 fart soundtrack and BF4 dubstep after that
Such a contrast between old and new

Maps are way too small and they are all corridors and tunnels

>>717512659

We have so much GoPro vids of actual trench warfare now. Would be nice to see how Dice manages to copy that terror in the game.

is this the most soulless and sterile BF to date

HOLY FUCKING SHIT DICE.
WHY THE FUCK CAN THE STUDIO THAT LITERALLY PIONEERED COMBINED ARMS WARFARE NOT MAKE A FUCKING BATTLEFIELD GAME ANYMORE??

BF6 PLAYS LIKE A BOOTLEG MODERN WARFARE 2019 GROUND WAR RIPOFF WHICH WAS ALREADY JUST A SHALLOW COPY OF BF3/BF4 TO BEGIN WITH.

HOW THE FUCK DO YOU MANAGE THAT?

>>717513974
>beta
its soul but you can rape me when launch comes and if it turns out as soulless

it wasn't just buildings, you could completely destroy the fauna and all objects.
In really intense games, by the end it was just a complete wasteland and everyone was trying their best to hide behind little piles of rubble, loved it so much.

>>717513974
its literally 5x more sovlful and better than bf 2042

>>717514410
2042 had cooler maps

>>717512312
I've played on more shitty maps than look like this in modern battlefield than I ever did in BC2.

>>717514475
Hourglass is hot dogshit.

the shotguns are rly good

>>717514312
It's been nearly 23 years since BF1942 released. The people who made it aren't there anymore. The company still exists but if all the people are different that doesn't mean anything.

>>717514475
looks fucking empty as shit

>>717514475
bro that map was absolutely horrid to play
this >>717514708
it was awful

>>717505607 (OP)
I only played like 3 matches but is Cairo the only map available? I like urban combat maps but not as the main course

>>717514664
hopefully they don't nerf them into oblivion

>>717514735
no, theres also iberian offensive which is better, and a 3rd map i haven't seen
but for some reason 80% of matches are on cairo in the matchmaker

>>717514664
nice overkill cod class, AR+shotgun what were they thinking....

>>717514664
You're not even vaguely close to center mass for most of those shots. What nonsense

is carl gustav in?

>>717514883
thats true, but every BF ever had really awful hit detection
+ im sure there's some server fuckery going on rn with the amount of players

>>717514829
right now it seems every class is kinda OP, every class has some wild shit, like the 5 rocket engineer, and the RPG in general is very good, fast reload, fast to pull out etc, i prefer this to everything feeling weak

>>717514883
>>717514664
seriously like 2 pellets hit his leg and he goes flying into the wall kek

>>717514664
Two main weapons was a mistake. What stops me from having an lmg and a sniper rifle? Ridiculous balancing issue.

>>717505607 (OP)
The finals got taken over by competitive faggots that pushed most casuals out of the game in weeks, and bf6 is going to go through the same thing even faster due to open beta stuff. Funny seeing them being compared and people getting butthurt when they'll both be at the same level of garbage overtaken by adhd kids and muh progamerz in less than a year.

>>717515064
You can only have certain weapons as a secondary im pretty sure.

>>717515151
the finals was that kinda game from the start... clearly competitive focused, BF not at all, so im not sure

>only 1 playlist with locked weapons
>Rush next week is not locked
>Breakthrough is unlocked

Predictions that DICE removes the weapon locking in full release later down the line?

>>717510703
That screenshot doesn't say much, looks perfectly fine.

>>717511703
That's Crysis 2, I remember that place.

>>717515205
Look at every second gameplay video you see today about bf6, it's already happening, and the influx of twitch-adjacent viewers/streamers is only going to make it worse and faster. It's the fate of pretty much every shooter these days, no one gets away from it, only cod drops their multiplayer support completely before it becomes the issue, but their model is unsustainable for anyone in the industry anyway.

>>717505607 (OP)
>we want the COD audience again
>the game plays like a shitty version of COD and less like battlefield

why do they keep doing this?

>>717515228
They'll probably keep it, but I doubt it'll get any attention. Everything will be balanced around unlocked weapons. Matchmaking will probably ignore it/it'll only be for one mode like now.

more sliding than threads on /pol/

Do we know if they are bringing back the airburst? The shield is dumb..

>>717515228
Locked class Conquest is a cope to make vets happy but its clear the game is made for open in mind

>>717515490
Shileld is great.

Why don't you guys enjoy anything?

>>717516046
I can't gaslight myself into enjoying the taste of shit

>>717516046
the whiners are always the loudest, the game has problems yes, but personally I had tons of "oh yeah this is battlefield" moments in just 1 day of playing this beta, I literally had 0 of those in bf 2042s entire lifespan of playing it for 30-40 hours, ZERO

>>717510426
Reddit.

Does it have 2009 OORAH tacticool alpha energy or 2020+ beta male TRT energy?

>>717516209
Anon, I am genuinely curious what you would describe as "oh yeah this is battlefield" moments in the beta. Outside of farming people in a tank, I have not got too much out of the beta that I haven't been able to get from playing COD a week ago.

>>717506950
this goes against my internal narrative so I will choose to ignore it

>>717516350
neither it feels like a product due to women soldiers

>>717516498
i mentioned one earlier, its hard to describe, its just a feeling, I was running through a bunch of alleys with a shotgun while they were all collapsing on top of me and explosions all around, go into a trench and clear out some enemies through all the chaos and make it out alive, it just felt like a battlefield game, shooting mechanics wise CoD has always dominated battlefield btw, but what makes BF good is the sense of scale, and I feel that in a bunch of moments here, point fights are chaotic as fuck

bf 2042 in comparison feels so goddamn sterile, its like some chinese mobile game, simply not battlefield

>>717515228
They just put it there so they could say "YUHH SORRY GUYS WE TRIED BUT GUGHHH LOOKS LIKE THE PEOPLE PREFERRED OPEN WEAPONS. SO SORRY!!! Anyway here's our battlepass goycattle"

>>717510456
no, you will get lasered by m1918 telescopic faggots sitting in smoke grenades

>>717513054
this is how ww2 actually looked

who is this shit even made for? guns are like toys, movement looks and is laughable ( You have infinite sprint ) can instantly weld and perform CPR than alternate between machine gun and back

>>717516868
>you have infinite sprint
>a feature since bad company 1
kys secondary

>>717516898
unrealistic stupid shit is now a feature
holy shit lol

>>717516681
>>shooting mechanics wise CoD has always dominated battlefield

>>717507593
Just because this is /v/, it doesn't mean we don't play video games.

>>717516952
nigga if you played both series like me you know i'm right, shooting in 2042 and 2 was like a bad joke compared to cod2/cod3/cod4, BC2 even the sniper and general hit detection was a joke, it competed with fucking black ops, some of the tightest and best feeling shooting in mp shooters, BF is never about that, its about the scale, destruction, vehicles, feel etc

>>717512312
Yes? Use the fucking Smokes™.

>>717516046
standards

>>717505607 (OP)
destruction would work in games that have no mid-game matchmaking but thats not what battlefield is
imagine joining a game, thinking you're going to have a shootout in this or that alley but it's all just flat rubble

its actually poopoo, no one will be playing this 1 month after launch

Is it good or not

>>717517186
what retarded cope is this
I lived for dropping into a BC2 game mid match and you could tell how intense the fighting had been so far based on what’s already been flattened. there’s always next match to get your pristine alleyway to fight in retard

>>717517306
there's a reason why they didn't replicate Bad Company
hell - it's in the name. it's a Bad game, a tech demo for Xbox 360, nothing more.

>>717517185
you sound like a 40 year old perpetually single cat lady who can't land a man because she can't help but try to date 2-3 tiers out of her league

>>717512975
Bad Company 2 didn't leave rubble nor ruins. Buildings were reduced to their foundations.

>battlefield is just COD
zoomers killed videogames

>Small maps
>Dogshit ttk
>Doubling down on the sliding bullshit
>Fucking bots filling lobbies
Its the same fucking game as 2042 holy shit you people will gobble up anything

>>717512908
At a vastly smaller map scale and match length. I am deeply impressed by that game's destruction mechanics, but it'd never work on Battlefield because there's just so much more to keep track of.

>>717516209
>>717516681
you could've just said I AM HAVING A BLAST! retarded faggot

>Demand kernel level access for muh anticheat
>Already broken before the open beta even releases to the public
lmao

>>717516943
>die once
>game does not delete itself and lock you from ever playing it again
unrealistic dogshit ungoh bruh

>>717517403
id replay BC just for the singleplayer
your AI squad members had more characterization then any recent game just by virtue of having fifty random context dependent idle conversations of them bullshitting about random topics

Do i need to link something with my twitch to get a code? Because I aint doing it if thats the case

I'm on max settings with DLAA and sharpness at 0 and at least the menu screen feels oversharpened. Anyone else?

>>717517717
nobody plays battlefield for the singleplayer campaign. again, an error of Bad Company corrected in later entries.

>>717517749
nah
you get the code in your inventory

even driving is worse than in fucking warzone, again, who is this SHIT made for again?

>>717517791
hey kiddo I get it, battlefield 2 was my favorite, but I liked BC2’s campaign

>>717517602
>Demand kernel level access for muh anticheat
this has been standard practice since like 2014

>>717517547
they don't need to make literally everything destructible but def needs to be more than how it's currently implemented in bf6
also there are some decent sized maps in the finals if i remember right

>>717517925
and it hasn’t been effective for about that long too

>>717505607 (OP)
Not playing your slop, it's fucking shit, from the movement to the class system, all fucking garbage.

>>717508007
>>717507593
>why are you talking about a newly released game rEEEEEEEEEEEEEE SHIILLLLLLLL
Why are you allowed to be here?

>>717505607 (OP)
I just want Siege of Shanghai, Golan Heights, and my Operation Locker.

>>717510837
>retard who never played stalker but insists gaymma is the trve way to play it has an opinion

>>717510837
>>717518213
although I agree about sliding, tarkovtards should not have any opinions on mp shooters

but sliding basically doesn't exist in the bf 6 beta... its the same as in bf4

>>717512457
The rubble is still cover, retard. Did you even play BC2? Of course you didn't.

>>717516681
I am the anon you actually replied to.

I guess I can kind of see how the chaos and the destruction in infantry CQC is a unique thing BF provides at this point but I do think it is interesting that you dont feel like 2042 was a Battlefield game. 2042 felt like a poorly designed Battlefield game to me, the beta just feels like it is having an identity crisis.

I honestly don't mind COD gunplay but I really struggle to understand why they pushed the TTK and movement further than the last two or three games. Everything really has started to feel the same and its comical how bad DMRs/Snipers are.

>>717517876
>>717518048

>>717517925
and somehow its still an impotent piece of shit, after more than a decade. Impressive

>>717514475
All its desert maps are shit.

>>717515015
>fly me to the moon
>and let me play among the tards

>>717516898
>bad company 1
The start of the codification of battlefield, faggot. Exasperated greatly by its sequel.
Battlefield should've stayed a slow pace PC excusive large scale battle shooter.

>>717508490
Woah that’s a penis O__O

>>717518485
BF peaked in BC2, it was the perfect balance

but yeah good luck releasing a shooter in 2025 thats as slow paced as BF2 and thinking it'd be successful

>>717508574
can the beta be played on steam? or only through whatever app ea has now

>>717518406
AHAHSHASHASHAHAHAHAHHA BATTLE SLOP HOLY FUCK

>>717511806
why do they refuse to bring her back

>>717516681
i have 2042 in my wishlist but can you go further on the "scale" because the maps of the beta is smaller then bf2 that's for sure

Maybe you're talking about the destructibility?

>>717518578
>slow paced as BF2
You people are retarded and gay.

>>717516681
>, shooting mechanics wise CoD has always dominated battlefield btw,

disagree, of the main 3 FPS franchises i've played, I'd say BF > Halo > CoD in terms of gunfeel. CoD guns and their firing impact feels so light

>>717518595
only steam is possible now, just have to associate ur EA account with ur steam one, otherwise u dont even need the EA app anymore

>Attack and Defend
>mfw sit at the default base as a Sniper like a rat
>boom headshot
>boom headshot
they can't stop me.
>mfw spotting all the soldiers for my team too

>>717518406
nice 2013 graphics

>>717515301
>remember playing crysis 2 for the first time in 2012
>campaign set in 2023
>think "wow, that's 11 years from now, wonder where i'll be then?"
>2025 now, pretty much in the exact same place and life hasn't really improved or changed for me since 2012 but i'm just older

>>717519048
the world and society dramatically decreased in quality since 2012
if you're the same gj :)

>>717511051
It's good, but then again it should be considering it's literally graphically aligned with BF3. Not even joking. Anyone who wants to prove me wrong, go in-game now and take a picture of the ground or anything. I shit you not, it looks like two generations ago. I get that it's a bet and they're focusing on performance to leave a good impression but I doubt the finished game is going to look much better.

>>717507494
In BFBC2 if you were playing rush on certain maps you could just destroy the building the objectives were in and it destroys the objectives. it was great.

>>717505827
Conquest is dumb. Your team and their team can capture and lose any points in any order.
Breakthrough has your entire team and their entire team defend or attack a single point, in order.

Conquest inevitably evolves into team deathmatch. Breakthrough is far more objective based and more coordinating with your team.

>>717519191
Battlefield has regressed back to BF3, it's actually ridiculous.

I was willing to forgive a lot but I draw the line at slidecancel. Why the FUCK is this shit in Battlefield now?

>>717518734
Too cool.

maps are minuscule, does not feel like battlefield at all

good to see battlefields UI design is still just "lets put a blurred rectangle behind it"

>>717505949
The Finals has amazing tech but Cashout fucking blows donkey dick. They need to have a breakthrough gamemode where it's just Team A vs Team B with max players possible. Also too many goofy zoomer Fortnite guns. Goo gun? Wtf?

Worth paying 4.99 on cdkeys for beta access? I'm curious but I don't want to pre-order

FUCKING FAGGOTS WHO PRONE IN CORNERS
FUCKING DIE OF AIDS

>>717512312
>Maps evolving over time = variety and fun.
>That only room you can't destroy because they claymored the door and have 2 guns watching it = gay

>>717519347
It is a noticeable difference for sure. The maps are okay but they feel like Counter-Strike maps to me. Compare the BF1 maps to this and it feels like someone with no imagination made these ones.

>>717519462
literally just watch a streamerfag for 30 min in the background wtf

>>717519462
open beta starts saturday, everyone can play it then

>>717519462
>paying for beta access
dont you get it for free if you watch 30 minutes on twitch? i got mine for free yesterday from a razer discord thing event

>>717519347
>just run around for 5+ minutes only to die to a camper was peak map design

>>717519462
Fuck no, you can get early access by idling on a twitch stream for 30 minutes. Though in many cases it takes a while longer for it to drop, but if you keep it running in the background you'll get one eventually. Until they

>>717512312
A map should looks like near the end of the battle.

>>717519540
>>717519542
>>717519563
>>717519604
ahh i thought you could only get access from pre-orders. gonna wait it out or just leave twitch sitting open i guess.

>>717511985
There was that one desert map that was a long stretch of sand buildings with two streets running the distance of it. Rush map.

BC2 is great. Downhill from there.

>>717518742
nta, but i know exactly what hes talking about. I was retarded enough to pre-order 2042 and every once in a while I try to go back to it and it just sucks. The maps are too big, youre running across huge spans of the map and barely seeing anything. Theres no atmosphere in 2042. In BF1 for example there was always scripted shit flying through the air, sounds of explosions etc that made it feel like a real war. 2042 has none of that.
A couple of months ago I tried 2042 again and after 2 matches I reinstalled BF4 and within the first few minutes I was shitting my pants with how intense the firefights were, I remember taking cover behind a pillar and chunks of the pillar were being torn off from enemy fire, the sound of bullets wizzing past your head, explosions etc.
Like the other guy said, I think "sterile" sums up 2042 perfectly. It just doesnt feel like a battlefield game. If you know the background of the development it all makes sense, it was fucked from the start. Basically all the senior staff that made previous games left after the launch of BF5 and the new team had no clue how to use the engine.

>>717519659
you have to link your EA account to twitch but only takes 30 min of watch time

Battlefield 6 is mid.
I mean, if you played Battlefield 3 or 4, or even Battlefield Bad Company 2, these older games (10+ years older) just played better.
They had better guns and customization, better tools and kits, better balancing.
Battlefield 6 will have far less and everyone will just use the OP gun/loadout when the game launches and nothing else and the game will just be boring.
The maps are not designed well. Bland and generic, no interesting biomes or events in the map, nothing.
Classes being able to use any Primary Gun is going to be an issue.
I've played Battlefield 6 beta for like 6 hours+ today, and it just feels like Battlefield Hardline, just a crappier version of an older game.
The graphics don't even look better either, they look worse, somehow.

>>717519760
>Theres no atmosphere in 2042. In BF1 for example there was always scripted shit flying through the air, sounds of explosions etc that made it feel like a real war. 2042 has none of that.
yeah thats what im talking about
atmosphere
this game has it, 6 that is, it feels pretty fuckin good, I suggest everyone just try it out saturday and decide for yourself, 40gb download

>>717518578
>BF peaked in BC2
lol
lmao

>>717519281
I know everyone hates 2042 but I miss the shootdown sentinel which eliminated grenade spams and made gameplay more strategic. Also the wingsuit was FUN, OKAY HATERS? If you wanted to nerf it, that's fine with me but don't eliminate it outright. It was just fun to fly around the map. You can eliminate the hero class, I don't care, just add fun and strategic gadgets. I like BF6 more than 2042 but it feels like a step back in some aspects like the tiny super condensed maps.

>buildings can't be destroyed
I want destruction not destroyed. I am sick of every map becoming 'fight over rubble'. I want stuff that remains up that I can make my own entrances in and flank and shit. If it's a case of 'you can only blow holes in certain points' then I'm not interested. I'm not playing the beta because I'll get burned out if I do it and I am also waiting for the inevitable
>SEASON PASS TO UNLOCK NEW WEAPON
>KILL 30 PEOPLE IN A ROW WITHOUT DYING TO GET NEW WEAPON
>THROW A GRENADE 5 TIMES TO GET COSMETIC NODS
Or whatever. I know it'll be there, I just don't want it. If you're going to put weapons behind battlepass shit (aka, second job mode) then at least make them free for everybody after a specific period of time. I don't want to have to spend 2-3hrs a day playing one game just so I can try out new stuff. Enlisted does this (and I've been a goodgoy and paid for a lot of stuff on there via sales) but I do dislike the 'play 2-3hrs and then do 2-3hrs of a secondary game mode to get extra stuff', so I suspect BF6 will do that but I dislike it.

Finally got a PC to run these kind of games 4k and quick but they put me off with all this extra bullshit. I just wanna go in a game, do a game or two, then leave. Otherwise I just get burned out playing all the time because if I don't I miss out of, I dunno, AN-94.

>>717519858
>They had better guns and customization
2042 was peak in terms of gun customization. And the community didn't want anything to do with it because it's 2042 which most people didn't even come back to play after opening weekend.
>The maps are not designed well. Bland and generic, no interesting biomes or events in the map, nothing.
Exactly. Where's my Metro / Underground / Redacted? Where's a big city map? Where's the flat terrain for tank wars?

>>717505607 (OP)
It kinda feels like a BF3.5
Even the destruction is kinda lack luster if you think that The Finals does it better.

>>717519923
There's just so many things they've done wrong, the lead of this game is competely fucking incompetent. Smaller maps, less destructibility (even though they advertised more), worse textures, list goes on. This is not worth $70 or whatever. This is what I would've expected a $30 indie game on steam to feel like.

>>717505607 (OP)
YOU remember wrong only small houses could be destroyed fully which had its downsides

>>717505607 (OP)
Anyone have any general tips on positioning or moving forward to objectives? I feel like I turn a corner and suddenly there a bunch of guys there peppering me down or they actually flanked me the whole time and I'm clearly doing something wrong

>>717505607 (OP)

battlebit was better than this

COD and BF are just paint by numbers slop at this point.

Red Faction 1 came out in 2001 and had complete destructible environments.

>2 days for a beta
>game out in OCTOBER
EA are retards, no one will want to play after seeing how boring it is now.

How can I play today?

>>717520281
What does that even mean

>>717520356
this, they killed the hype they build by showing the game, if they waited until release they would at least get more initial sales

>>717520356
boring? its tons of fun
I literally had more fun with 5 hours of bf 6 than 50 in 2042, the series is kinda back, we'll see if they fuck it up by early release

>Have the winning formula with the bad company design i.e. destruction, sick ass weapons, etc.
>Refuse to incorporate those in any meaningful way for years
>also tree leaves have collisions on. Chuck a grenade at them and watch it bounce back at you
Why

>>717516681
>trenches
Mirak Valley isn't in the beta.

>>717520356
2 day beta (+2 extras for preorder/twitch viewer cucks) this week, another 4 days next week

>>717520559
i think the devs or whoever was in charge, the team of people, behind bad company design, no longer work at DICE.
its all DEI woke hires now. the battlefield 6 director is a woman with dyed hair (diversity hire) who had to ask twitter why does battlefield 6 need a server browser for?
its over.

>>717505607 (OP)
BC2 was the last good BF game

>>717505607 (OP)
I fucking knew they would do this. again. they've been nerfing destruction to shit ever since Battlefield 3 (included), yet fanboys who stick with the franchise are weirdly in denial about it. wtf happened to the players who like Bad Company 2 and would always hold it up as the peak of the series? they must have either joined the denial cult or left like I did even earlier.

>>717505607 (OP)
It's a good call of duty

>>717520559
But you don't even NEED to work at all. Literally copy all the cool shit. Upgrade things normals care about such as graphics and ship it. Nothing else is required.

>>717520449
it's a full price game, if it was f2p it might have a chance.

>>717510703
wow, Black Ops 3 is holding up surprisingly well.

yeah it looks like shit but has anyone else noticed how those trees in the top right corner look literally ripped straight from Crysis 1? WTF

btf4 still a better game
there's no point with 6

>>717509420
>PS3 graphics
Why do people say retarded shit. I'm not reading the rest. You people.

>>717511410
>>717511849
>>717513629
>>717513728
NPCs or shills?

the most popular servers even as far back as BF2 were infantry only. there has always been a huge infantry only community in Battlefield and what you're really doing here is helping EA get away with once again not offering a SERVER BROWSER and CUSTOM SERVERS RUN BY THE COMMUNITY. kys.

So I just link my EA account, my Twitch account (I have neither) and then watch some slop streamer for an hour and I can play today?

>>717519589
skill issue

>>717520183
I think The Finals absolutely pushed hardware to its limits that's why they can only do 6v6 or whatever. 6v6 in BF6 would have been super lame. At least have some buildings been fully destroyed and others have scripted Levolution.

>>717520230
Stick with your squad. That's mostly it. The maps have too many flank points. It's chaos. That said I constantly finish at 10%.

>>717521408
yeah but i think u get a code which u need to redeem somewhere, people are already getting multiple codes, u only need to watch for 30 mins -an hour

i didn't get it through twitch so idk

>>717521482
>6v6
i thought the finals was 3v3v3v3? or maybe they changed it, i havn't played in like a year

>>717511439
NO. Goddammit stop fucking hyping up BF3 as the end all be all of Battlefield, that game had multiple fucking issues.

>>717521482
What the fuck is The Finals?

>>717521408
You don't need to link anything. Twitch sends you a code to your inbox on Twitch after an hour of watching any BF6 video. Throw that code into EA Redeems Codes SAR. I would watch the official EA/BF6 channel though just to be safe or alternatively open up a bunch of windows.

Sorry, not playing a military shooter with female soldiers!

>>717521626
also this

I love that most players are still bad in the beta

>>717521563
>i thought the finals was 3v3v3v3?
lol no. I think it was only 3v3v3 at the beginning. But they added a team deathmatch and some attack/defense mode earlier in the year. I think it's up to 5v5, no more than 6v6.

>>717521626
I love female soldiers, I wish all militaries had them

pubg is STILL better than this, bf/cod is just generic slop.

and the devs confirmed bots. so retards can feel good about headshotting a pylon.

>>717521589
Just pull up a video on YouTube. It's a Hunger Games styled shooter made by ex DICE employees. Very impressive tech but absolutely shit marketing no one knows about it. Free to play but somewhat low population pool. Idk say 50k-100k. A lot of sweats on there. Still fun to play and try.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAK5xFWA3pk

>>717521940
there are only bots in the "training ground" mode specifically meant for that

i just want a MP shooter just a touch faster than HLL and requires less of a communication commitment, but there is absolutely nothing in that sector that i know of.

>>717522087
the game should be f2p with monetized skins, asking full price just ensures the game is DOA, same with COD black ops #1293289

>>717521982
the destruction in the finals is amazing but the long TTK feels like shit, feels like im playing a moba, meh

>>717521982
>the debris has zero weight to it
yuck

>>717522147
>same with COD black ops #1293289
these games aren't DOA, black ops 6 currently 60k daily active players on PC, much more on consoles, and crossplay is standard

only ones that can't pay for games in 2025 are jeets, CoD is like 80$ and still whenever a 20$ skin comes out the full lobby is rocking it next match

>>717518734
because it was never adopted and when included it in bc2 there were plans to

>all these BF:BC2 haters
>most of these niggas weren't even around then
>of the time, one of the most enjoyed and liked BF game to date to the point where even /v/ had its own dedicated servers for a few months

Buttfield: Bro Company Pretty Fun 2 threads and games were fucking amazing. Yall had to be there. I pity you zoomers who weren't there.

>>717522261
I can afford the game fine, the problem is player base with a full price game. I dont want to play bots.

>>717522160
Yeah. Like they absolutely perfected the engine - amazing destruction WITH gaytracing that is actually optimized and lets you hit 165fps but the problem is the modes aren't fun and it kinda plays like a zoomer Fortnite with stupid hero bullshit. Also I hate free 2 play models. Imagine if we had that kind of destruction in BF6.

>>717522337
nigga what the fuck are you on about? there are bots in the "training ground" mode meant for new players which is purposefully 90% bots 10% players

the standard playlists don't have bots

>>717522278
war tapes was the only good thing in bc2

>>717522337
It's battlefield, there's not going to be a player base problem.

>>717522407
if the player base falls off after 2 weeks the games will be populated by bots, devs said so.

>female soldiers in a battlefield

>>717522510
link? sounds like ur just misunderstanding and they were talking about the training ground mode

Played quite a bit of it today
>shit maps, only the mountains one is half decent
>no teamplay at all, I can count on one hand the amount of people I've seen reviving or reparing tanks, squads rarely stay together
>hitreg problems, like BF4, V and 2042, this one has hitreg problems as well, I've had fools sit in front of me and my bullets didn't register.
>matchmaking is horrible, either my team stomps or the enemy team stomps, no close matches
I guess this comes with the territory of a first day of a multiplayer fps but doesn't change the fact that it feels horrible.
I've had fun ngl, but for now at least it's not convincing me to buy day 1, if all the other maps turn out to be similar to these ones then I'm 100% not buying it at launch, I won't pay EA 70$ to play Firestorm 24/7

>>717522278
Bc2 was hated by the Bf2 folks back in the day for no prone and smaller maps. But it was meant to be a console game. It was my favourite and nothing has come close since. Bf3 was a massive downgrade.

It's actually funny a game in 2010 made for console has larger maps than 'return to form' marketing bullshit Bf6.
Bf6 has like 3 lanes per map with a bunch of nook and crannies to hide in and destruction that doesnt make sense since you don't know what can be destroyed without trying.

Who the fuck even liked operation firestorm in Bf3 too... It was one of the most boring maps

>>717522607
He's right. Bots will backfill dead lobbies.

>>717505949
Retard.

Maybe it's because I'm only getting the city map, but I'm not having fun.

why is it 24v24? should be like 50v50 at least on huge maps with vehicles

>>717518134
Jesus you have shit taste

>>717518734
While it looks cool as hell, it is for all intents and purposes a G36 reskin. Maybe they could make it a cosmetic set for the G36, but it isn't worth a whole separate weapon.

>>717522909
>50v50
retard

>>717505607 (OP)
>zoomer now understands why BC2 is still considered the peak of the series

I don't like how fast the reloads are. It's like they're not even there.

>>717505887
>the game with the best destruction did it wrong
>also the best bf game

>choose spot to respawn at over and over
>get shot, beg for medic or respawn
>repeat
yawn

>>717523086
>>717523301
kys

>>717523516
Welcome to battlefield nigga

>>717524140
better title for this game desu

I'd buy Battlefield Nigga for 70 moneys

>have to wait 2 months to play the "full" game
EA are stupid

>>717514664
>>717514883
This is a cherry picked clip, it's usually not a kill even at close range if you're off-center

>>717524251
idk what ur smoking senpai, the shotguns regularly 1hit

>>717524214
Pretty sure that was Hardline.

>>717508107
There was a 280k queue just to get into a server earlier today…

>>717521750

most people really just want to have a power fantasy simulator these days.
God and how many retards are there that call themselve unironically battlefield veterans.
Everything today screams narcissism, fucking youtubers, gamers, etc Games are aimed to feel a certain way not to entertain you, late stage capitalism.

>>717507494
>>717507589
>>717519191
Shame that's ancient lost technology now, like Damascus steel or Roman concrete or the Moon Landing. Maybe in a few generations they'll be able to rediscover it.

I just played some 2 arab maps and quit that shit, how is that even battlefield when maps are smaller than ground war in call of duty? niggers running arround with shotguns in buildings aswell.
And optimization is utter crap, below 60fps. BF5 I get 120+ and game looks stunning. This is DOA for 70€

>>717524625
They took it out because it played like shit. It's that damn simple.

>>717524332
they do yeah but they also regularly don't, if they're off center

>>717512078

Anybody still play this? Point me in the direction of getting my steam copy to join a server to play again? Fuck it, I wanna relive the good ol days'

Tanks with engineers are literally invulnerable unless you can get your team to swarm them with rpgs

Its fine, way better than 2042 and i somehow managed to play that piece of shit for 400+ hours. I just hope theres more variety in maps like in previous BF titles. Not necessarily setting wise but different layouts, don’t need empty stuff like 2042 but something akin to Caspian or Arras is fun too imo. All 3 maps in the beta feel more cramped than Seine or Bazar.

>>717505827
breakthrough is twice as hectic and IMO twice as fun, one team is attacking and one team is defending, there's only like two objectives at a time to focus on attacking/defending, when those objectives get captured you get two new objectives that are further into enemy territory again that must be capture, until finally you cover the whole map and capture the enemy base and win or the defenders win by withstanding enough assaults.

>>717524698
>>717524698
>>717524698
GET THE FUCK IN HERE SHILLS FUCKING BTFO

>>717523301
BC2 had great destruction but it wasnt fun when the entire map was flattened half way into a match.

this beta has some of the worst maps ive ever played in the series. seems like they just wanted muddled samey art installation bullshit instead of a cohesive fun to play flowing map like the older games

>>717524697
The best Battlefield ever played like shit? Then why are you playing the current even worse versions?

>>717514664
They already said theyre nerfing the shotgun because it had some accuracy bug, but couldnt fix it before the beta

>>717515301
>>717511703
>>717519048
>>717519134
It's wild how shit UE5 TAA+RTX slop games look compared to Crysis' perfect rasterizer.

>>717521210
He's a spambot that jannies won't do anything about. Check the archives.

>>717524512
Quoting this post because of the pic and message. Last intelligent being in here.

>>717525880
need a woman built like this to beat the shit out of me

>>717521982
>f2p
That's the problem. You have to make f2p games super basic with no advanced features like destruction so jimenez in the favela can play it. That's how shit like CSGO became the biggest F2P title ever to the point all the little jimenezes in the favelas abandoned skulltag/zandronum for it.

>>717526108
At least CS2 scales with ELO, but I hate the map rotations and the gloves and useless crap and the entire storefront are for losers who will spend money to feel superior whilst they play like shit. It really is just a narcissism "look at me" simulator.

>>717526108
>>717526234
jeet bros its the price of 2 mcdonalds meals these days, the BF community will mass buy anyway soon as they learn that its better than the tragedy that is 2042

>>717526356
uhhh the posts are not even disagreeing with you

>>717526459
oh sry i speedread

>>717510456
its kino

>>717526356
>2 mcdonalds meals

yeah excuse me but not all of us consider 3 plus size meals (times two) as "two meals"

I can smell your stink of grease, cubicle slave

>>717505607 (OP)
>I remember in BC2 almost every single building could be leveled
I remember most matches in BC2 were being played on a flat plane by the end.

cant see shit

>>717527035
Well you remember wrong

>>717527257
update your drivers

It's honestly pretty fucking mediocre. Was not worth the effort enabling secure boot, TPM and updating drivers. Feels more like Call of Duty than Battlefield. Maps are shit. Female soldiers constantly shouting is grating as fuck. Also, why the fuck does assault has so little ammo? It's like two mags and you're out. Fucking shit. Already uninstalled.

why is it so desaturated?

>>717527775
I like that ppl don't have infinite ammo like in earlier bf titles. Wouldn't hurt to maybe have one more mag though. Map design is as if it was made by AI based on counter-strike maps. Very generic with an emphasis on tight corners and branching paths. Really generic; really boring.

What the people harping on about Bad Company 2 destruction won't mention is the fact that the buildings in that game are copypasted onto multiple maps. DICE made like 20 fully destructible buildings and pasted them onto the maps whereas games after that use buildings that are made to be a core part of the maps and not setpieces. The lighthouse on Valparaiso had no destruction whatsoever and "coincidentally" only showed up on that map.

>>717523613
Cry about it bitch.

>>717526356
Do you just shart out posts with whatever the most recently popular buzzwords when you fail to think up an actual statement to make?

>>717527775
>the effort
>of turning two things on that should have been on in the first place
>and clicking "install" on the driver updater
Jesus christ how much of a lardbarge are you?

>>717509219
>kept combat fresh
>after halfway point of conquest, there weren't nay buildings so every match was just a boring field.
retard.

>>717505949
>>717506840
Jeets

>>717528063
I just started playing support even in Domination. Infinite ammo, infinite smoke grenades, infinite healing, can even put down cover when caught in the open. I honestly don't think a backup shotgun is worth losing all that

>>717518290
>the rubble is still cover
you're the one who didn't play BC2.

>>717505607 (OP)
Nerf defibrillator

>>717528993
NO.

>>717528705
Retard

>>717513398
>It's a carbon copy of call of duty with faggot bells and whistles
Yes and BF6 is following them to also be closer to CoD.

>>717511781
>Maybe I'm just not as much of a graphics nigger
Yes you are more of an generic nigger.

>>717527257
>TAA: high
>volumetric anti soul fog: max
>COD killbox map: yes
"2042 killer" KEK

>>717511703
it runs at 100fps+ on 1440p with 3060ti + gpu set to 45% power so i guess i win. graphicfags lose.

>>717522668
So, no link?

>>717529997
>45% power
literally why
/v/ is fucking retarded

>try to launch game
>YOU NEED SECURE BOOT
>go to bios and change it
>YOU NEED TO UPDATE TO NEWEST DRIVER
I feel like I'll need to show them my dick next to be able to launch it

>>717530101
>>717530101
so i get 0.6w/fps

>>717526356
>as they learn that its better than the tragedy that is 2042
It's literally 2042 v2.0 kek
They changed the color palette, added destruction, made the maps smaller and gameplay slower and guns more realistic. Some of the UI and background mains are literally 1:1 carbon copies. You wouldn't know though because you never even played 2042, just joined in on the circlejerk shitpost.

>>717530101
indeed, I just set it to 90 FPS as limit so I have some room for drops and stay above healthy 60 FPS, the limit of my screen. limiting by "power" sounds the most poorfag thing to do. why even get a strong card if you run it with an energy limit rather than a frame limit. this site is full of midwits.

>>717519215
Filtered low IQ subhuman.

>>717530036
https://gnn.gamer.com.tw/detail.php?sn=289987
:v)

>>717522667
BC2 was amazing and playing that game with the lead up to BF3 was moment for the BF series as a whole

>>717530368
that's literally meaningless and retarded just set an fps cap wtf

can my GTX 980Ti handle bf6?

Literal dogshit game. What is this built in wall hack everyone has that puts a giant red diamond above everyones head as theyre within 100m of you holy shit

>>717530668
not rly the same thing boss

>>717530416
its not like 2042 in the slightest tho, you're just being disingenious, I played 2042 for 40 hours, had more fun with 3 hours in 6, we talked about this before but 2042 is nothing but huge empty maps with weird soulless engagements, it plays like a cheap knockoff, 6 feels like a battlefield game

>>717530970
yeah it's focused on making sure you get the performance you need in games instead of an arbitrary efficiency goal which is fucking retarded

>>717530416
>ita just like 2042 except for all these big differences
Based retard-kun.

>>717531080
>yeah
nah

>>717528705
>knowing how a game works means you didn't play it
Oh sorry, I must have imagined surviving bullets and explosives coming my way because the rubble of collapsed buildings blocked them. Absolute cumguzzler.

I think the guns are bugged, I can't hit anything

>>717522649
>I can count on one hand the amount of people I've seen reviving or reparing tanks
Do YOU ever revive or repair tanks? Or do you just expect someone else to do it for you so that you can continue to play the "fun" classes and actually shoot shit? You're a fucking retard and I hate you. Third world mindset of "nobody else is helping me what the fuckkkk!!!!!!" yet remain to not help your fellow neighbor with anything.

>>717531308
Could it simply be a matter of skill?

>>717525032
Lost Soldiers and BF2hub.
Shame the servers seem to be dying, it used to have a lot of full servers 2-3 years ago. If you can't access LS (shit seems to be down at the moment), just find a pirated copy online and install BF2hub.

>>717518290
>The rubble is still cover
Cool, and the map has basically been reduced to a glorified paintball arena halfway through the match. BC2 had this problem, take off the rose tinted glasses dip shit. The "destroy everything destruction is good" was the mentality I had when I was a teenager, then my brain matured and realized how fucking boring that is because BF1 had desolate shit areas of No Mans Land which was just a sniper farm.

If you can't understand that having a few buildings and areas that stay partially up and offer verticality and vantage points is a net positive to a match then you're an intellectually inept faggot. The only argument I keep seeing from you contrarian niggers is "destruction = good" without a modicum of thought put into looking at it from a level design and engagement standpoint.

>>717522268
Malaysia adopted it

>>717532196
SEA trash is irrelevant on this site

Somehow the game is more cod than cod itself

>>717532043
Except it wasn't a problem, it was a good feature and people who actually played bad company 2 aka not you dumbass zoomoids defending nerfed destruction knew how to play the game right and handle those scenarios.

>>717529176
Yes you are.

>>717505607 (OP)
This game is fucking shit. There's no consequence for running around like a dick head because cover is everywhere. Everyone is roaming with SMGs because long vantage points are virtually non existence -- 2042 was genuinely better in this regard.

Bring back the days of Bad Company 2 man, that's allI fucking want. Enough of everyone being hero, you have to move as a squad if you want to win. It feels like COD more than anything and I don't like it, but tbf I've never like Battlefield outside of Bad Company.

>>717533040
what you describe is just a consequence of tight urban maps, there'll be more maps at launch i believe

also BF 2042 was cancer with its huge open maps thats why they blined i think

>Watched some e-celeb fags stream for 30 minutes
>Still no drop
I hate this pajeet coded nigger site so much its unreal

>>717533106
>BF 2042 was cancer with its huge open maps
I enjoyed locking down areas with a machine now. Moving on an objective without a vehicle or multiple people should result in failure or you getting picked off. It feels strange for a BF game to be so hostile to camping as a strategy.

>>717508831
is the finals a 64v64 large-scale warfare simulator? didn't realize it was a ripoff of battlefield I should be playing that instead

>>717533607
>I should be playing that instead
we all know you won't and still seethe in here until the thread page 10's

The maps are too small.

>>717505607 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QMtxC8vxpxs
they need to update the movement system in bf6 to something like this to increase the skill ceiling to compete with cod

i dont like the women and the blacks and shit but honestly that shit is not why bf is shit now, the game is just shit that stuff is just the cherry on top

game is good, BF is BACK!

A tour de force!

>>717518869
have you played Modern warfare 2019? It has the best gun animations and gun sounds.

>>717505607 (OP)
>>717505752
>>717505795
>>717505816
Worst game I've played in my life, uninstalled

>try to play on my PC
>press button to fire once
>gun fires its entire magazine

>>717531796
I'm always ptfo-ing mate, medic on close quarters maps to revive and heal, engineer on big maps to take air out of the sky and repair vehicles.

>>717535259
>not even a 2kd
liability to your team. always hated you ptfo retards circa bc2/bf3-4 when none of you guys could actually kill people on the objectives themselves, just pile on the obj and die bro!

>>717535360
I try my best anon...

I firmly believe the public has grown too stupid to properly critique a game. This thread is a great example; filled to the brim with hyperbole both retarded and "ironic". For the latter, don't you realize you are shitting in your own mouth? You've made your opinion so worthless, devs fell for following woke trends for brownie points.

>>717535608
as long as you're actually tying to clear the obj of enemies instead of those retards jumping on the obj dying for free going "b-but i ptfo though!" you're fine in all honesty

>>717535695
Seeing people ironically and unironically saying destructible environments are bad is breathtaking

>>717535695
Dude, just play the free weekend. Either you like it or you dont. Either you are schizophrenic and will not use the secure boot or you will.
It's 2025 which is really 1984. In this year 2+2=05 aka 2025.
Nobody cares about anything anymore at all.

>>717521750
>pulls out secondary
>it's a fucking shotgun
WHAT THE FUCK????!!!!

DICE/EA told me not to buy their games, so I shant.

>>717536243
assault can have both a shotgun and a pistol on top of the AR

>>717535905
destructible environment is good
having no cover is terrible

You're a vehiclecuck so your opinion doesn't matter anyway

>>717505607 (OP)
>people still give a shit about military shooters
grim

>>717531015
Literally cope. I guarantee you don't have 40 hours and haven't played 2042 since launch. Go ahead and post the stats from Steam.

>>717536428
They're my favourite type of shooter anon...
I don't want to go die in some shithole country IRL but I love to larp as a grunt in my vidya

>>717536607
>I guarantee you don't have 40 hours
NTA but this is an anonymous imageboard. Literally nobody cares about your e cred. This ain't reddit, but yeah be sure to tell people about how cool you are, who literally have no object permanence and forget about your worthless existence the moment they switch to a more interesting tab.

>>717535259
>PAX ARMATA
Who's that?

>>717536607
you sound mad he has a different opinion than yours and there is no downboat here, lmao

Damn, flares aren't worth shit now.
>Jet comes in for a strafing run
>Lock with a stinger
>Flares
>Isn't even able to pull out and exit lock range before flares run out and I hit him with the stinger

>queue
>siege of cairo
>quit
>queue again
>iberian offense
>quit
>queue again
>siege of cairo
>quit
>queue again
>iberian offense
>quit
>queue again
>siege of cairo
>quit
>queue again
>iberian offense
>quit
>queue again
>siege of cairo

>>717536917
another massive W over 2042, flares were so fucking retarded in that, you had permanent ones, and they worked every single time, legit idk what they were thinking with that game, what a joke

>>717505795
To be fair it's 2025 not 2010, modern "AAA" developers suck shit and are subhuman

>>717505607 (OP)
the game plays like a retarded fast paced e-sports game

that's not what battlefield is about, EA completely missed the point

ITT: boomer uncs crashing tf out cuz they have the reaction speed of an 80 year old granny and cant hang with the kids anymore

>>717537547
>>717537804
pretty much, slow paced games just can't succeed in 2025, its one of those "once you go X you don't go back" things

>>717535360
Better than you COD babies who killed games like Brink because anything more complex than "kill da enemy to death" makes your undersized brains boil.

>>717535905
They're children who didn't actually play BC2 and don't know you still had cover when a building collapsed.

>>717538381
>They're children
>children these days don't think it's fucking awesome when a building explodes
What the fuck happened?