>>64155022
you can have a small ragtag insurgency AND several capital-sized ships
going back to
>>64135100
>george lucas said he patterned them after washingtons continental army and mostly envisioned a true civil war rather than an empire fighting an insurgency
I feel like Washington's Revolutionaries were lots more ragtag than, say, Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. for one, the latter were at least ten times the size of the former, yes?
so I don't have an issue with the EU portrayals, it feels like that's what the Rebels would really be doing most of the time. in fact I feel Rogue One captured the spirit of Lucas's intent most accurately. yeah, you have a fleet and a Council and a General and an Admiral, but they're tiny. your "fleet" can't fight off 1 space station and 2+1 Star Destroyers.
and your infantry force? you might have a small group of "regulars", they might even have a General, but also a lot of your infantry are terrorist groups scattered all over and doing their own thing most of the time. I'm not American, but IIRC when they first declared independence, the American forces were made up of a lot of ragtag militia, correct?
and even in the ACW, in addition to the main Confederate and Union forces, there were battalions armed with muskets, and battalions armed with repeating carbines, and every degree of equipment standard in between, right? and lots of bushwackers and jayhawkers and whatever going around, right?
in short I don't think the EU depiction clashes with the main movies
>>64155063
The British were fighting multiple battles across the globe at the time. Gotta look up out of the American-centric worldview for anything before 1940