>>509041998
>the point
>your head
"Real Marxism" is whoever controls the narrative. Not some set of "scientific" principals created out of thin air based on a shoddy historiographic hybrid of whig and determinism. The fact you have to have purges to begin with is telling that there is little to no scientific basis in Marx's writings. Rather, it is a pseudo-religious cult for material "progress." That being said, the purges failed to properly root out the distasteful bits you don't like. After decades of waiting, writing and theorizing they are now in charge. The orthodox marxists were left out in the cold because the predictions and human agency which would facilitate same failed in the 20th century and you seemingly acknowledge those failures. Those failures are how the faggots took power in your movement again in the west. Post-modernism is the ideological offspring of Marxism and has now taken its rightful place as the guiding philosophy of your movement in the West because of the movement's own failures. So, I will ask my question again. If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use is the rule?
