>to get the piñata creature you have to grind like a wageslave

>>716092746
This. And (I'd say 'before you guys mention it', but you already have), the "1600 new quests!" really doesn't amount to much.
I played all 3 beta's and still nearly fell asleep from questing. There isn't enough new things, and it's widely spread out. You're still going to do the same annoying iconic quests such as "60 pirates" and "40 pirate hats" and "kill 60 beasts for Tirion" and "60 quilboar tusks".
There's almost no difference.
The worst part about this, is they think the minimal addition of these new quests is enough to add in a -50% Exp mode: that applies to quests too. Even Turtle isn't sadistic enough for that, just mob kills on their end, and even Turtle's amount of quests isnt enough to make it not a slog towards level's 40+. It's going to be an insane hassle on Epoch.

>>530862295
yare yare daze

>>529338229
can i get them to make new monsters? returning monsters are kinda lame because i've already fought them

>>528600224
there it is, like clockwork
>uhhhhhhh you just like invincibility ok
Of course I like invincibility, and nobody is disputing that current Valkyr only has invincibility going for her. The point you don't seem to understand is that post-rework Valkyr will not fix a SINGLE issue she has. Not one. Her kit isn't going to be "dynamic" or engaging, it's going to play identically to how it currently does, but without the ONE thing that gave Valkyr any sort of niche compared with the other melee frames.
>Ripline groups enemies now
Great, her 3 already did that, also the stated base range of the pull is miniscule considering range is already Valkyr's dump stat.
>Warcry is mostly unchanged
Enough said, it's... fine, and Pablo evidently feels the same way. Moving the enemy slow to Paralysis is a kind of lolworthy move, and the duration buff is irrelevant in a world where [Eternal War] exists.
>Paralysis gets modern line-of-sight (a nerf by another name lmao), damage vulnerability on affected enemies (because Valkyr needed more single-target damage, apparently), and now costs energy instead of shields (because even Pablo knows in his heart that post-rework Valkyr will be a shieldgating frame)
>Hysteria has been taken out behind the shed and shot, which seems to be the one thing almost nobody is disputing at this point
So to summarize, the only "dynamic" element of post-rework Valkyr will be the dynamic act of going from alive to dead.

>Mutts are so mindfucked they think it will automatically go back to the Democratic (((Party))) next election
>Mfw there won't even be an election
It's fucking dead.

>XI died years too soon
>XIV didn't die soon enough
FUCK this gay ass tranny earth

>>527669296
>>527672950
>its real
https://youtu.be/OTLmD2kFDm0?si=8q7mC92bCggs1zgi
genuinely who wanted this fucking wannabe has been skrillex over daft punk

>>712803561
I swear I saw this post yesterday. Deja vu?

>>7579295
It's not outdated, go to any MFA show, or at least, having gone to one a week ago I can tell you this problem is still there even with so called "High tier schools."
>But examples of breaking from the mold exist!
Yes, but this is also a part of a larger super fucked problem.
You see art education in general, has been doomed by the fact that great artists aren't great writers.
So if you taught a technique and didn't put everything down in a book it got lost.
It is only in recent years we realized "Oh shit there really is all this lost knowledge-- and it's gone."
Someone here will tell me "X manuscript exists" or "Y school teaches this."
Yes but we do not have a full working method for every artist in history, nor do they go fully into detail, some of their secrets we only know because of modern science scrutinizing their paintings. Most schools at their best teach only to 1800s methodology if at all.
Kenyon Cox mentions when he studied under Gerome only 2 students picked up what he taught verbatim, most others were just there to pass his class and move on.
This is why painting developed quick from each painter to painter.
The underpaintings changed until there eventually was none, and so on.
Eventually things we taught long were replaced, then eventually those things faded, figure drawing became academic, and then it was gone completely.
The way we taught things in the past was fundamentally flawed and now we're realizing there is a sincere competency and archival crisis in art.
"Dude you can sign up for figure drawing classes now" and "But some artists don't suck!" are not a valid response to this.
Richard Williams did more by writing that book than he did with any class he taught because he realized schools eventually change curriculums.
Most artists don't realize this but selling books>teaching hands on.
Ideally with photos if not videos as well.
Unless you want to be a dick and hold a monopoly on knowledge.
That sure won't backfire.