>>530368249
I just got here, lol
And I see I missed a perfect example of how namefag theatre is a useful tool for people to weasel out of a corner when it suits them.
>>530228073
>imply that any criticism of a IX remake would be invalid
>>530229680
>ask what criticism WOULD be valid
>>530368249
>namefag deflection time!
This guy loves to say he's here to discuss, but will also chimp out if any of his takes are questioned. All anyone is asking him to do is explain his own point, but he can't do that.