>>514862419
>Any other historical example? seems to have only happened with Stalin USSR.
any other late-industrializing countries likely had similar economic expansion without the vast millions of starvation deaths.
>seems to have only happened with Stalin USSR.
And China.
>Mass die offs usually are accompanied with substantial economical contractions.
yeah if you're not also industrializing.
>Factories needed alot of workers.
Industrializing an agrarian economy results in the need for less labor.
>Where did Stalin find them if he was too busy killing by the tens of millions?
they came out of the fields.
>Russian and German industrialization started around the same time, the mid 19th century.
No it didn't, German industrialization took place in the mid 19th century, Russian industrialization didn't take place until the mid 20th century.
>Yet Germany never saw periods of such economic growth.
The German economy grew massively during industrialization.
>But USSR did, and on top of that they slaughtered tens of millions, according to kikes.
You're a kike lol.
>It didnt do it for Portugal, for Spain, for France, for Belgium, for Netherlands, for Britain, for Germany, for Switzerland, for Austria, for Denmark....
Literally every country saw massive increased in economic output from industrialization, what are you talking about?
>When early industry is so labor intensive.
No going from a totally person-powered agrarian economy to mechanized farming requires less workers. This isn't complicated. If you go from having horses and mules to tractors you need less hands. Modern american farms are run with SHOCKINGLY few people, except at harvest which has resisted mechanization due to the abundance of cheap labor (but they're going back so expect your fruit to get picked by drones and octobots and shit now).
>Smells fishy....
I also smell the Gefilte fish but it's just your stinking kike breath.