>>519375411
>you have to understand the process of drawing. the artist does not have a complete picture in mind then just lets the pencil do the work. he us still thinking and concentrating during the act of drawing
He may or may not have a complete picture from the outset, but the point is that he directly manipulates a visual medium in a visually-oriented process with tools that control primitive elements in the visual domain. When you look at "AI art", for all you know, it may have been produced by someone congenitally blind. It really is that simple.
4chan Search
15 results for "0c8f1fe20d21566c11e3a7d8da48c918"
>>519361973
>look behind any popular agenda whatsoever
>it's a bunch of kikes, billionaires, glowgroids etc.
>ignore it if it's an agenda you've been programmed to support
>call it out if it's an agenda you've been programmed to oppose
>look behind any popular agenda whatsoever
>it's a bunch of kikes, billionaires, glowgroids etc.
>ignore it if it's an agenda you've been programmed to support
>call it out if it's an agenda you've been programmed to oppose
>>519115317
Hmm. Well, if they wanna talk about Germans being victims of something, how about Britain's intentional starvation campaign against Germany which persisted even after WW1? THAT was really uncalled for. Anything they got after WW2 - they 100% had it coming.
Hmm. Well, if they wanna talk about Germans being victims of something, how about Britain's intentional starvation campaign against Germany which persisted even after WW1? THAT was really uncalled for. Anything they got after WW2 - they 100% had it coming.
>>515343965
>Anyone else feel like there's an insane amount of tension right now and that it's going to explode soon?
None whatsoever. This is pure theatrics. It's a continuation of the same slow and methodical buildup towards an engineered civil-war type event to be followed by a high-tech police state and then by methodical extermination of human cattle. You signed up for this. Enjoy the show.
>Anyone else feel like there's an insane amount of tension right now and that it's going to explode soon?
None whatsoever. This is pure theatrics. It's a continuation of the same slow and methodical buildup towards an engineered civil-war type event to be followed by a high-tech police state and then by methodical extermination of human cattle. You signed up for this. Enjoy the show.
>>515035234
>donkey memeflag
>seethes profusely about a rare instance of truth-telling
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. :^)
>donkey memeflag
>seethes profusely about a rare instance of truth-telling
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. :^)
>>512307428
>the structure of gradual change from one similar creature to another gets evident with enough data, does it not?
Yes. That strongly suggests gradual change. But it doesn't support any particular theory as to what causes that change.
>the structure of gradual change from one similar creature to another gets evident with enough data, does it not?
Yes. That strongly suggests gradual change. But it doesn't support any particular theory as to what causes that change.
How come anything that relates to cognitive abilities ends up being such a honeypot for the dumbest subhumans on the board?
Today's challenge for """AI""" tards who think computers will become conscious by executing the right program:
Name an actual, physical phenomenon that can be arbitrarily distributed (up to unavoidable sequential dependencies) across time and space the way I can do with whatever computation is supposed to be facilitating artificial consciousness.
If you can't do it, which of the following options summarizes your position?
1. Consciousness is not a real phenomenon
2. Muh heckin' artificial consciousness is different from every other phenomenon
3. Consciousness only emerges if the computations are done in the right way, even though the output is the same (i.e. consciousness is functionally useless)
Name an actual, physical phenomenon that can be arbitrarily distributed (up to unavoidable sequential dependencies) across time and space the way I can do with whatever computation is supposed to be facilitating artificial consciousness.
If you can't do it, which of the following options summarizes your position?
1. Consciousness is not a real phenomenon
2. Muh heckin' artificial consciousness is different from every other phenomenon
3. Consciousness only emerges if the computations are done in the right way, even though the output is the same (i.e. consciousness is functionally useless)
>>512028031
>Why is promiscuity seen as such a bad thing
If most men can't benefit from it, neither should the minority of men and the majority of women that do. Simple as. There is no rebuttal to this rock-solid reason to punish promiscuity.
>Why is promiscuity seen as such a bad thing
If most men can't benefit from it, neither should the minority of men and the majority of women that do. Simple as. There is no rebuttal to this rock-solid reason to punish promiscuity.
>>512025790
Based. Imagine giving rights to meat robots created by nature solely to transport a womb around.
Based. Imagine giving rights to meat robots created by nature solely to transport a womb around.
>>512023261
>When do we accept that school is just institutionalized part-time child slavery?
If merely being """schooled""" hasn't managed to convince you of it, """schooling""" has succeeded in making you into a golem. Absolutely evil system.
>When do we accept that school is just institutionalized part-time child slavery?
If merely being """schooled""" hasn't managed to convince you of it, """schooling""" has succeeded in making you into a golem. Absolutely evil system.
>all the posts siding with the ZOGbots and/or trying to find some way to blame OP
Yeah, that sure looks organic.
Yeah, that sure looks organic.
>>511311022
>If we can overproduct food, get knowledges for free on internet, provide housing and healthcare for free for poorer countries, then why don't we distribute those thing evenly for everyone?
The system known to produce such abundance is one whose basic operating principles contradict your Marxist drivel.
>If we can overproduct food, get knowledges for free on internet, provide housing and healthcare for free for poorer countries, then why don't we distribute those thing evenly for everyone?
The system known to produce such abundance is one whose basic operating principles contradict your Marxist drivel.
>>510870566
>If you think someone is "crazy" chances are they just have a higher IQ than you.
There's different types of "crazy". The most common type involves retards being blatantly unaware of basic reality unfolding before them and being completely incapable of objective self-assessment. They don't have any interesting takes or grand ideas, they just act like malfunctioning biology.
>If you think someone is "crazy" chances are they just have a higher IQ than you.
There's different types of "crazy". The most common type involves retards being blatantly unaware of basic reality unfolding before them and being completely incapable of objective self-assessment. They don't have any interesting takes or grand ideas, they just act like malfunctioning biology.