>>3862866
Is that why you first tried to call me an ESL for making a "typo", and your only mention of bongs is now after I specifically explained it to you - and then you tried to ignore it until I pointed out you'd done so? The best thing about you retarded ESLs is that you constantly self-report.
>in what way was that a question or me asking for something
Were you agreeing with him? Because normally when someone claims that a given statement is untrue, they're expecting evidence or an argument to prove or refute the statement.
>>Yeah, which is why I specifically said in my post "after".
>which, wasn’t what you were arguing initially
KEK
Actually that's exactly what I was arguing initially, in that very post. Nice job, retard.
I'm glad to see you're seething so hard you're going all out with the ESL accusations despite having just demonstrated that you are literally an illiterate ESL yourself :)