>>716300060
>people hate AI because it looks janky and soulless
depends on who is creating and why, being free to use means the bar will always remain low, it's true >while devaluing real art
not true
making art is something humans have done and always will
popular digital art will obviously face competition from easy clones yes, the same way camera has replaced painting as portraiture
>and letting giant corporations churn out even more slop for cheaper and faster
If your jpb was to making kike propaganda in the first place, I have no sympathy for you, artist only got upset when ai could be used uncensored and free, not when big copro was going to use it
>flooding real people's creative output in the process
this is a real issue with all digital media online, ai AI-generated images, video and text will quickly dominate online, I've read it was ~60% of the net and it much be more by now
Google et al are the ones pushing ai on everyone, the very gatekeepers of the internet, I have no illusions, human-made content will be a minuscule tiny portion of online, in niche walled gardens.
