Search results for "1f600a5e0deacd658f19e5b0db96f936" in md5 (5)

/vg/ - /bgg/ - Baldur's Gate General
Anonymous No.538010159
Subhuman.
/vg/ - /bgg/ - Baldur's Gate General
Anonymous No.537556236
>>537555602
I'm a simple person. I like frogs. And I fucking hate stupid fat pigs that imitate human speech or make rape jokes.
/vg/ - /bgg/ - Baldur's Gate General
Anonymous No.535275964
>>535274036
You conspicuously left out the worthless pig fuck - the creature that vomits incomprehensible wordslop, spams its slop like an attention whore, cheats and brags about it, constantly gets the basics of the lore wrong, thinks that Shar or Lolth were portrayed as really mean goddesses in BG3 because of the "writers' relationships with their parents," and jokes about Astarion being sexually abused. No worries, it's an understandable lapse.
/vg/ - /bgg/ - Baldur's Gate General
Anonymous No.535107682
>>535103694
Most of those who didn't romance your boytoy can look at him (or his ass) without feeling anything. A certain subhuman swine might joke about him being sexually abused, though that has less to do with repressed desire and everything to do with being subhuman. Does that clear things up, or would you like to continue this weird narrative of Astarion making thousands of men question their sexualities?
/vg/ - /bgg/ - Baldur's Gate General
Anonymous No.534628498
What you - the obnoxious piggy that can't help but claim ownership of past posts because that's what a narcissist does - said was not "factual" in any meaningful sense. At best, it was a vapid truism that boils down to, "Did you know a non-character could be interesting if he had agency?" Yeah, that's kind of the whole point of contention, halfwit. Did you know that if you didn't post obnoxious slop or make jokes about Astarion being sexually abused, you might not be viewed as subhuman? Some slop for thought.

The non-character has no agency - therefore, I will not refer to him as if he's anything more than a quota-meeting prop. Having a "story" has nothing to do with agency or personhood. The "story" is that the duke's son died in a tragic accident in the Underdark, or maybe he came back and saved the city, earning daddy's approval in the process. Does that make a character? Not really. If the writer has to hammer home the point that someone is a hero, then they are no hero at all. If a character has to latch onto the narrative like a leech because that's the only possible way they can be "relevant," then they are no character at all. Somehow, even the shitposter that wastes time with questions like "Do you think he would make a good Paladin?" understands this. You are dumber than that.