>>18143719
>If he's mild then who's extreme?
James "kill your mailman to fight the Jews" Mason comes to mind.
4chan Search
15 results for "267c710bae21aa8974eab08bb80b7e4f"
>>18074579
>You think Israeli's would have just stopped at some arbitrary point?
Yes, because you can only seize so much territory before it becomes impossible to hold.
*see Israel's abandonment of the Sinai peninsula in 1982
>>18074699
>Shinji-posting
Now, let's discuss Palestinian population growth from 1948 to 2023...
>>18074720
But enough about what the Gulf States did to their own Jewish populations the moment Israel was established.
>>18074753
>Then the settlers will demand more land because they'll use the previous forced "concessions" to justify future ones.
OR the Israelis would appear to be blatant aggressors (not being able to justify it under security reasons, which was the excuse for their invasion of Syria after Assad fell last year) and other nations, such of the United States, would draw a much harder line on not permitting them to seize territory from a sovereign Palestinian state, especially since not taking a hard stance against land grabs was one of the major triggers for the last major global war (y'all know which one).
>>18074823
>Retard it’s the psycho Zionists like avraham stern who couldn’t live alongside Palestinians
>what is the Hebron massacre
>what is the 1936 Arab Revolt
>You think Israeli's would have just stopped at some arbitrary point?
Yes, because you can only seize so much territory before it becomes impossible to hold.
*see Israel's abandonment of the Sinai peninsula in 1982
>>18074699
>Shinji-posting
Now, let's discuss Palestinian population growth from 1948 to 2023...
>>18074720
But enough about what the Gulf States did to their own Jewish populations the moment Israel was established.
>>18074753
>Then the settlers will demand more land because they'll use the previous forced "concessions" to justify future ones.
OR the Israelis would appear to be blatant aggressors (not being able to justify it under security reasons, which was the excuse for their invasion of Syria after Assad fell last year) and other nations, such of the United States, would draw a much harder line on not permitting them to seize territory from a sovereign Palestinian state, especially since not taking a hard stance against land grabs was one of the major triggers for the last major global war (y'all know which one).
>>18074823
>Retard it’s the psycho Zionists like avraham stern who couldn’t live alongside Palestinians
>what is the Hebron massacre
>what is the 1936 Arab Revolt
>>18073766
I was just trying to back up your point with a tidbit about the last underage American to die in uniform and how this lie wasn't just "I'm totally 18 trust me bro" but that he actually went out of his way to fool the recruiter
I was just trying to back up your point with a tidbit about the last underage American to die in uniform and how this lie wasn't just "I'm totally 18 trust me bro" but that he actually went out of his way to fool the recruiter
Continuation of >>18009125
>choosing terrible friends
Who are the friends of Palestine today?
Russia? It’s a thousand miles away and is full of Jewish oligarchs who all have Putin’s ear, and he’s always going to defer to keeping them pleased over siding with the Palestinians.
The Houthis? They’re mountain guerrillas who apart from whipping the Saudis have no great achievements to their name. To them, the Gaza War is more of a convenient pretense to engage in piracy than anything else.
Iran? The Ayatollahs see Palestinians as little more than a means to fuck with Israel and America, nothing more
Neo-Nazis? Not only is this movement politically impotent in the Western world, they’re only compelled to take the Palestinians’ side because they hate the Jews. A follower of Hitler will never take up arms for the Palestinian cause or call them his racial brothers. The Palestinian will always be a useful subhuman who dies fighting International Jewry so he doesn’t have to
Cultural Marxists? While they are great at spreading their brain poison throughout the Western world, they’re also incapable of translating that into serious policy, at least without jeopardizing their own position
>unrealistic expectations
This one is perhaps the most egregious of all. Simply put, the Palestinian leadership from Grand Mufti al-Husseini to Sinwar, are absolutely terrible at setting concrete achievable war goals. They consistently align with the wrong allies and set grandiose objectives that cannot be realistically achieved with the military strength they have available. Worse yet, many of them likely see the conflict with Israel as little more than a means to stay in power, so they don’t even want to win the wars so much as continue them indefinitely. Israel also has this problem, but it’s still a democracy where fucking up enough will eventually result in a shakeup in leadership as Netanyahu will likely soon find out. Hamas-controlled Gaza has no such recourse
>choosing terrible friends
Who are the friends of Palestine today?
Russia? It’s a thousand miles away and is full of Jewish oligarchs who all have Putin’s ear, and he’s always going to defer to keeping them pleased over siding with the Palestinians.
The Houthis? They’re mountain guerrillas who apart from whipping the Saudis have no great achievements to their name. To them, the Gaza War is more of a convenient pretense to engage in piracy than anything else.
Iran? The Ayatollahs see Palestinians as little more than a means to fuck with Israel and America, nothing more
Neo-Nazis? Not only is this movement politically impotent in the Western world, they’re only compelled to take the Palestinians’ side because they hate the Jews. A follower of Hitler will never take up arms for the Palestinian cause or call them his racial brothers. The Palestinian will always be a useful subhuman who dies fighting International Jewry so he doesn’t have to
Cultural Marxists? While they are great at spreading their brain poison throughout the Western world, they’re also incapable of translating that into serious policy, at least without jeopardizing their own position
>unrealistic expectations
This one is perhaps the most egregious of all. Simply put, the Palestinian leadership from Grand Mufti al-Husseini to Sinwar, are absolutely terrible at setting concrete achievable war goals. They consistently align with the wrong allies and set grandiose objectives that cannot be realistically achieved with the military strength they have available. Worse yet, many of them likely see the conflict with Israel as little more than a means to stay in power, so they don’t even want to win the wars so much as continue them indefinitely. Israel also has this problem, but it’s still a democracy where fucking up enough will eventually result in a shakeup in leadership as Netanyahu will likely soon find out. Hamas-controlled Gaza has no such recourse
>>64225560
Ruling by decree is and shall always be, one of the dumbest ways to govern a country.
>>64225561
>>64225580
What part of my statement was incorrect you incredulous faggot?
>>64225567
Trump is intellectually and spiritually closer to an African than a white man. If he was even a shade darker, I'd follow James K. Vardaman's example and publicly call him a coconut-headed, chocolate-colored typical little coon.
Ruling by decree is and shall always be, one of the dumbest ways to govern a country.
>>64225561
>>64225580
What part of my statement was incorrect you incredulous faggot?
>>64225567
Trump is intellectually and spiritually closer to an African than a white man. If he was even a shade darker, I'd follow James K. Vardaman's example and publicly call him a coconut-headed, chocolate-colored typical little coon.
>>64219153
>there's unlikely to be many Venezuelans in the military.
The ones that are would be men whose families fled Maduro's misrule and would be even more keen on participating in his violent overthrow than native-born Americans. For them, it would not a betrayal, but a liberation.
*see Italian and German (and Japanese to a lesser extent) refugees who signed up to fight for the Allies in WWII
>>64219157
What are you even niggerbabbling about?
>there's unlikely to be many Venezuelans in the military.
The ones that are would be men whose families fled Maduro's misrule and would be even more keen on participating in his violent overthrow than native-born Americans. For them, it would not a betrayal, but a liberation.
*see Italian and German (and Japanese to a lesser extent) refugees who signed up to fight for the Allies in WWII
>>64219157
What are you even niggerbabbling about?
>>64151589
>>64151730
>>64151745
Honestly you could tell this summit was going to go nowhere just from the fact that that they didn't bother to negotiate a ceasefire beforehand, something that even the Israelis and Hamas had to accept.
>>64151730
>>64151745
Honestly you could tell this summit was going to go nowhere just from the fact that that they didn't bother to negotiate a ceasefire beforehand, something that even the Israelis and Hamas had to accept.
>>64145912
>>64149119
>>64149172
Al Qaeda's propaganda chief, Abu Bakr Naji, wrote an entire book called Management of Savagery detailing the strategy behind suicide bombing and terrorism.
per the wikipedia summary because I'm not going to risk getting myself put on the No-Fly List to pull actual quotes.
>In stage one ("vexation and empowerment") the "will of the enemy" would be broken by destruction of "vital economic and strategic targets". In Muslim-majority countries these would include "oil facilities and the tourism infrastructure". A campaign of constant violent attacks (vexation operations) in Muslim states will eventually exhaust their ability and will to enforce their authority. Concentrating security forces to protect these sensitive targets will cause the state to weaken and its powers wither, leading to a breakdown of public order, since "if regular armies concentrate in one place they lose control. Conversely, if they spread out, they lose effectiveness". Salafi-jihadists will take advantage of this security vacuum, launching an all-out battle on the thinly dispersed security forces leading to the destruction of the state targeted by the jihadis. Extreme violence is emphasized.
>In stage two is the "administration of savagery" (Idarat al-Tawhush). In the wake of the breakdown in order, the law of the jungle will prevail and survivors will "accept any organization, regardless of whether it is made up of good or evil people." Jihadists can take advantage of this savagery to win popular support, or at least acquiescence, Jihadis will be the organization—enforcing sharia and providing basic services of security, food and medicine. The areas they control will serve as bases to attack other states that have not yet been overthrown, to "plunder their money, and place them in a constant state of apprehension".
>In the third and final stage, ("empowerment", Shawkat al-Tamkeen). The area or areas they administer become the nucleus of a new caliphate.
>>64149119
>>64149172
Al Qaeda's propaganda chief, Abu Bakr Naji, wrote an entire book called Management of Savagery detailing the strategy behind suicide bombing and terrorism.
per the wikipedia summary because I'm not going to risk getting myself put on the No-Fly List to pull actual quotes.
>In stage one ("vexation and empowerment") the "will of the enemy" would be broken by destruction of "vital economic and strategic targets". In Muslim-majority countries these would include "oil facilities and the tourism infrastructure". A campaign of constant violent attacks (vexation operations) in Muslim states will eventually exhaust their ability and will to enforce their authority. Concentrating security forces to protect these sensitive targets will cause the state to weaken and its powers wither, leading to a breakdown of public order, since "if regular armies concentrate in one place they lose control. Conversely, if they spread out, they lose effectiveness". Salafi-jihadists will take advantage of this security vacuum, launching an all-out battle on the thinly dispersed security forces leading to the destruction of the state targeted by the jihadis. Extreme violence is emphasized.
>In stage two is the "administration of savagery" (Idarat al-Tawhush). In the wake of the breakdown in order, the law of the jungle will prevail and survivors will "accept any organization, regardless of whether it is made up of good or evil people." Jihadists can take advantage of this savagery to win popular support, or at least acquiescence, Jihadis will be the organization—enforcing sharia and providing basic services of security, food and medicine. The areas they control will serve as bases to attack other states that have not yet been overthrown, to "plunder their money, and place them in a constant state of apprehension".
>In the third and final stage, ("empowerment", Shawkat al-Tamkeen). The area or areas they administer become the nucleus of a new caliphate.
>>17927646
It's not even that Ribbentrop was unqualified, he was just flat out fucking bad at his job. A lot of businessmen were used as unofficial intermediaries by both the Axis and Allies to varying degrees of success.
It's not even that Ribbentrop was unqualified, he was just flat out fucking bad at his job. A lot of businessmen were used as unofficial intermediaries by both the Axis and Allies to varying degrees of success.
>>17834752
>titanic disaster wasn't a single crisis. It was years of complacency, outdated procedures and lack of awareness/training all around, that all came together in spectacular fashion.
Exactly, it was a bunch of smaller lapses in judgement and regulation, and misreading of the results of previous accidents (such as the sinking of the RMS Republic in 1909), that coalesced at a single point in time to create one of the most spectacular tragedies of the 20th Century.
>i've also heard that proper damage and flooding control could have kept the ship the ship afloat for hours longer but idk if thats just wishful hindsight
If aggressive damage control measures had been taken in the first five minutes and been kept up, maybe it could have bought the ship a few extra hours. But realistically, that wasn't going to happen with an unexpected collision in the middle of the night when half of the crew were sound asleep and the other half were half-asleep. 1st Officer Murdoch to his credit shut the watertight doors within seconds of the collision (and likely prevented the ship from sinking within minutes), it just wasn't enough.
>titanic disaster wasn't a single crisis. It was years of complacency, outdated procedures and lack of awareness/training all around, that all came together in spectacular fashion.
Exactly, it was a bunch of smaller lapses in judgement and regulation, and misreading of the results of previous accidents (such as the sinking of the RMS Republic in 1909), that coalesced at a single point in time to create one of the most spectacular tragedies of the 20th Century.
>i've also heard that proper damage and flooding control could have kept the ship the ship afloat for hours longer but idk if thats just wishful hindsight
If aggressive damage control measures had been taken in the first five minutes and been kept up, maybe it could have bought the ship a few extra hours. But realistically, that wasn't going to happen with an unexpected collision in the middle of the night when half of the crew were sound asleep and the other half were half-asleep. 1st Officer Murdoch to his credit shut the watertight doors within seconds of the collision (and likely prevented the ship from sinking within minutes), it just wasn't enough.
>>63946626
>The U.S. has a more laissez-faire approach because our version of secularism is that you can believe whatever you want and the government gets out of the way, and there's no state religion (okay the president will say "God bless America" but it's generally more of a private matter)
Were it not for the institution of Separation of Church and State, this country would have dissolved into a religious bloodbath that would put the Thirty Years War to shame centuries ago. That half-sentence in the 1st Amendment
>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
has saved us from more trouble than we can begin to imagine.
>The U.S. has a more laissez-faire approach because our version of secularism is that you can believe whatever you want and the government gets out of the way, and there's no state religion (okay the president will say "God bless America" but it's generally more of a private matter)
Were it not for the institution of Separation of Church and State, this country would have dissolved into a religious bloodbath that would put the Thirty Years War to shame centuries ago. That half-sentence in the 1st Amendment
>Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
has saved us from more trouble than we can begin to imagine.
>>63863171
Please cite one passage written by Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels supporting your position.
>>63863179
Centrally planned economy is merely part of it. Communism is more than an economic system (such as capitalism), it's an ideology, a quasi-religion arguably.
>>63863190
>it's when the government hands the economy to bankers
It's literally not
>it's why Jackson killed the banks
In case you didn't notice, Jackson had already come and gone by the time Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto
Please cite one passage written by Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels supporting your position.
>>63863179
Centrally planned economy is merely part of it. Communism is more than an economic system (such as capitalism), it's an ideology, a quasi-religion arguably.
>>63863190
>it's when the government hands the economy to bankers
It's literally not
>it's why Jackson killed the banks
In case you didn't notice, Jackson had already come and gone by the time Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto