>>5016711
Nta but why would you want to make meat more expensive and not crackdown on excess populations which are illegally living in a given area and increasing food demand? Surely the focus should be the inverse. Remove international exportation or importation of meat and making farmers fill in the gap would do better infrastructurely in the long term and decrease the demand in meat overall by removing an international buyer base fron the equation It would also force farmers to be more considerate of land management to maximise meat cultivation while remaining free range (which they should be more considerate of anyway) and encourage the local crop market to keep up with livestock feed which in turn would make healthy crop goods cheaper across the board for the consumer, leading to an averagely healthier population. Even if you're anti-meat that is a good trade off to have as it will encourage poorer populations (which are increasing by the day as the middle class falls off) to go to vegetable or grain crop goods if they are cheaper than processed ones. Thus leading to a slowly increasing healthy population with less strain on the healthcare network and the economy as a whole.
