Makes one wonder.

>>82226524
>>82226545
Tranny hate is simple:
Every society needs an easily identifiable "untouchable caste" to maintain social cohesion. Peasants/wage slaves/etc will accept their shitty situation as long as they're better off then most trannies.
Negros used to fulfill this purpose but in a multicultural society you need an out group that's equally easy to identify but not race based, so trannies are it.
>But trannies are a protected class
Oh no, the establishment is merely giving them enough rope to hang themselves (letting them do such awful stuff no one will feel bad for them in the future). Why do you think they're letting them do drag time story hour and write articles defending pedophilia? And if you think the (((establishment))) won't throw them under the bus, consider how leftists abandoned blue collar workers (who used to be their main protected group), it's brilliant actually.

>>82176108
I work for a psychology clinic(front desk) that basically specializes in lifelong male NEETs, so I'll tell you some observations:
>30-35yo
It's about twice as hard for them to make it compared to someone in their 20s. I'd say about 1/3 make it, another 1/3 improve somewhat, and 1/3 totally fail.
>40-45yo
It's about 4 times as hard. About 20% make it and 30% somewhat make it.
>45yo +
It's basically game over. If you've been a lifelong neet this far you're not gonna make it. At best you can slightly improve.

hat hier jemand einen 6" kindle (also den normalen, nicht paperwhite oder sonstwas) und kann mir schnell zeigen wie das mit der kleinsten schriftgröße aussieht? in reviews werden immer nur rentnertaugliche schriftgrößen mit 2 wörtern pro zeile gezeigt.

>Race
>Age
>Height
>Income level
>PP size (or boob size)
>Last time you had sex
>Hobbies

>>17903000
OBJECTIVE RANKINGS: (Using AI to judge their writings (complexity of their writing/ideas)).
>1)Marx 180
About the same level as Rousseau or Plutarch
>2)Churchill 160
About the same level as Carl Sagan
>3)Hitler 155
About the same level as Robert E. Lee
>4)FDR 135
About the same level as Alexander Hamilton
>5/6)Lenin/Stalin 130
About the same as Walt Disney or Ford.
>7/8)Mussolini/Che Guevara 120
About the same as Jordan Peterson.
>9)Mao 110
About the same as Andrew Tate.
As you can see no one on the list is outright stupid, with the dumbest one being Mao but he's still higher then most people.
NOTE: THIS IS USING AI NOT MY OPINION.

my m6 is in the shop and will be there for a long time probably.
in the meantime should i get a Nikon F100 + 35mm f2/D or a Leitz Minolta CL

Didn't she become famous from a show where there are trannies, gays, blacks and all sorts of DEI people? Where her original and probably biggest fans come from?

Gee, I wonder why fans of those kind of shows are a bit angry, especially when they are the loudest voices online. It really is a mystery.

Is being white a bad rebirth or something?

could someone please help a retard out that never attended a footy match in his life. im looking to buy tickets for my best mate cause hes a huge Arsenal fan, but Ive no clue how to go about this and the prices for tickets. From what I saw on the club page, away tickets are distributed by a ballot system which makes it hard to get. Whats confusing me is that ticket reselling sites already had seats priced for hundreds of quid before the ballots went live.


Specifically I am talking about the Man U. vs Arsenal game on the 17th August. Id love to be able to buy a ticket for the away section of the stadium -- are ticket resellers the only way? Is it normal that they really charge upwards of 400 pounds? Id really appreciate if someone could explain the process behind this

>>212651031
hä?

>>212473031
Same thing happens on /v/ when a hyped game is coming out. I wonder if /o/ does the same when a new model of a car comes out, or /lit/ with books. Arguing about sales all day long.

So a bit of context, there's this girl I'd been talking to casually for about 3 years. I always liked her but she had a bf during that time, well she broke up with him December last year and she reached out to me January this year. We started going out in late February and have been on a relationship since. She's my first gf and for the first few months things were great, but lately I've been feeling like this is more trouble than it's worth? I'm very emotionally numb due to childhood trauma and to be honest I don't feel strongly about most things, like I haven't cried in years and yesterday she called me during work because she gets very bad PMS and was crying and feeling very angry and shitty and I just couldn't think of anything else other than hanging up and go eat. She says she's a very emotional person but I have no point of reference with other women, so not sure if this is an issue with her specifically or just any woman in any relationship. I pay for everything which is fine but she has expressed desires of being a stay at home wife even though none of us wants to have kids, and while my income is high my QOL would drop significantly if I had to sustain 2 people, I just don't want to do it and I'm sure if I were to stick with it it would become a problem later on.

Am I being unreasonable? Do I have the wrong expectations about this relationship thing? Because I feel like I would be feeling the same regardless of who the girl was or how she was or how she looked, I'm 24 and spent basically all of my life just hanging out on my own and it's comfortable for me. I don't really vent or rant about much to her and so I don't feel like I get much out of being with her. I feel loved for sure but I mean if I have to do all of this just to get that that feels very transactional and retarded. Not sure what to do here, should I sitck with it?