>>536947245
>She is an Anchor. Her primary directive is to bind Sonic, to domesticate him, to bring "The Wind" to a halt.
Stop spreading this lie and read what pic-related says. Any idea that Amy wants to "bind Sonic" is 100% WRONG.
>>536947245
>."My analysis identifies her as a "younger female Sonic." Her motivation is not derived from another character, but from an internal drive for Justice. She is an inspirational figure who proves a civilian can rise to heroism. Your loyalty to your simplistic "mirror" theory is founded on emotion, not empirical data. I can appreciate that, but it is ultimately incorrect.
This analysis is nonsensical.
Cream's character role is as the kid-sidekick to Amy, who is the Minnie Mouse to Sonic's Mickey Mouse. Cream is a young child who is orange-ish and/or yellow-ish in color with the ability to fly through the sky, and she's noted as being exceptionally gentle and soft in-contrast to both Sonic & Amy being rougher around the edges. In contrast to Amy in particular, Cream is cooler in temperament, with her politeness contrasting Amy's tomboyish attitude. But she follows in Amy's footsteps as a pure-hearted character with compassion. Similarly, Tails' own timid nature due to his background of being bullied, and his more analytical mind, contrasts Sonic's absolute self-confidence and impulsive urgency to get the job done as fast as possible. Sonic and Amy both rush head-first into danger while Tails and Cream are both more cautious and look before they leap.
It's not about copy-pasting Sonic or Tails onto a female template and calling it a day, that's not wat "Girl version" actually means here. Amy and Cream fill the corresponding roles to Sonic and Tails from a very feminine equivalent perspective, while also contrasting certain aspects of them.
And again, just to re-emphasize this point: Amy Rose does not want to bind Sonic. That was never true. Stop spreading lies about Amy.