>>64004264
>Anon, *every* ship must be able to do self-maintenance, except for those banzai charge fast attack craft, who aren't intended to survive after they launch their missiles.
Yes, I said this in
>>64004025
>It's just that there is a hard limit to *what* you can feasibly maintain, regardless of on-board facilities.
Yes, obviously.
>>64004314
It substantiates nothing. It's citing a different organization. One which has extensive shore-side facilities. Not the Germany navy -- which has no such facilities -- hence the reason for the greater self-maintenance requirement. You're actual denial of reality. We have a public statement of that requirement, and no such news of the class's conops changing. In build or deployment. Not even mentioning the 10k displacement, if not made up of extra workshops and component stores, is therefore what?
If the class's conops has changed, fine, but point to something that states it.
