>>106017597
yeah it was done back in march
though if you want new news, due to the new uk laws that went into effect yesterday, UK is banned from that website
>>716145947
funny you say that
all the privacy-breeching age verification shit that's about to hit soon is entirely "cope" to absolve parents of any liability
>More chillingly, company directors and designated managers can face personal criminal liability if Ofcom determine we failed in our child safety or moderation duties
