>>17980616
Well yeah, everything we do IS predicated on food and sex just like any other animal but we also have the ability to plan and think ahead so the means to get to those ends is way more complicated than an animals, because while an animal just eats and has sex in his cave and dies in less than 30 years, we have the ability to determine and plan for how we can raise our own standard of living in order to optimize and maximize our access to food and sex, hence why we invented computers, because now physical pussy is no longer required to pleasure ourselves since we now have access to infinite porn, that's a level of optimization that is only possible with clever planning and a high level of intelligence.

This is one of those problems with real theologians understand, but mainstream religious leaders tend to not address for one reason or another
Basically we don't know who the one true God is, but we don't think God expects us to know either, that wouldn't be reasonable. We can only suspect that the truth lies somewhere within various pieces of evidence that is believed to have been left for us, and our ability to reason and extrapolate is a gift that enables us the ability to debate and discuss these pieces of evidence, whether it's the natural world, or in written religious texts, and through this debate, through experimentation, and through extrapolation, we get closer to the truth.
The only difference between a secular naturalist and a religious church leader in this regard are what their standards for evidence is. Also nobody takes biblical literalists and fundamentalists seriously. Everyone who has gone to an actual seminary laughs at those retards.

>>17972958
According to the Founding Fathers, most white men shouldn't even be allowed to vote, since this was originally restricted to land owning whites males, and most people in the colonies and early US were not landowners, they lived on Chartered land, because founding stock held a great deal of influence in early American politics. But one thing you retards always miss is the fact that they also believed that rules like this one shouldn't be written in stone but should be open to revision. Most of the Founding Fathers were abolitionists who, while not supporting an immediate release of African slaves, did support a gradual release of African slaves.

This is even reflected upon in early abolitionist legislation, such as the New York Act for the Gradual Abolition of Slavery of 1799.

>>17928242
>Who's your earliest known ancestor?
They were born in the mid-900s in what is modern-day Southwest England. Records from before this are complicated, because while we do know when the person before this was born, we do not know their name, as before this individuals weren't documented, but their clan or house was, and so they were simply written down as the patriarch of the house of which I get my surname. Based on my surnames meaning, and where my earliest ancestor is from, we can infer that this individual or their direct ancestor likely came from what is somewhere between what is modern-day Belgium or the Netherlands, basically between modern-day France and Germany, and at some point crossed over the English channel. This would've been sometime in the late 800s to early 900s most likely. I also know the exact names of every single one of my ancestors between then and now. The individual from the mid 900s would be my 30th Great Grandfather.
Of course I have the privilege of having connections with professional genealogists so this kind of thing is literally their job. But honestly, most of these people have little relevance to me, it's just fun trivia and it's neat to know where I ultimately came from.

>Doomer wojak try to demoralize on /x/
>On Fit
>On Pol
>On Bant
Mhhh, go back >>>/r9k/
Btw Im lucky today and am smiling lol.
Seethee about it

>Moon Day
>Tiw's Day
>Odin's Day
>Thor's Day
>Frigg's Day
>Saturn's Day
>Sun Day

What does it mean to "reject" Jesus according to you? Interestingly enough, there are Non-Christians and even Atheists who don't actually "reject" him per se
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_atheism

If you mean "reject" as in "reject his divinity" then of course it's probably going to be for lack of credible evidence

1.) It wasn't a military loss (in fact, Saigon fell after the military already left the country)

2.) It's only considered a loss in America itself ironically enough. For the Vietnamese it is taught as a Civil War, with America simply backing a side of it rather than being directly involved. It would be like considering the American Civil War a loss for Great Britain because they floated backing the Confederates

3.) Vietnam and the US maintain good relations today, so it's mostly water under the bridge.

It seems to me that the only people treating Vietnam as some point of humiliation for Americans are either brown third worldists or self-hating Chuds.

>>81907822
Yeah I was thinking some kind of antichrist thing.
Gnostic Incels it is.

How would a "gas powered engine" even work in a world that lacks the manufacturing tolerances capable of high compression ratios and/or without the ability to generate high enough current to drive a spark gap needed for ignition? All early engines were steam engines as they are external combustion engines as opposed to internal combustion engines and thus do not require either of these things to operate.

dear federal agents, arrange 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in order of your likings - most favor to least favor

thank you for your service

>>936308549
>maturing to 6 years old so you can finally post on the old anime retro greentext website

What happens when horny boys and men, thinking it’s the end, start to get a little frisky?

>>211751045
I’m a chad