>>81595582
That's an incredibly retarded conclusion.
It's like asking
>Would you rather work and never be able to buy a lottery ticket again, or never be able to work again and your only source of income are lottery tickets? (Your winning chance remains the same)
It's not like everyone considers winning a lottery and being set for life some miserable fucking experience and they'd rather "enjoy" a lifetime of 9 to 5 wageslavery.
It's just that since your odds still remain abysmal, it's basically a choice between going homeless with a tiny sliver of a chance of having a good life vs. okayish life but you'll never win a lottery which is something you likely wouldn't do either way.
And just like that your question is, for most people, a decision between eternal blue balls with tiny chance of nicer experience or actually being able to relieve yourself.
When presented with a choice of smaller guaranteed reward or big but low chance reward, most people will pick the guaranteed one because despite the fact that they'd prefer the big reward it's just not worth giving up what you already have for a tiny chance of getting more.
