>>81920542
>Presenting a theory with no evidence is also cope?
I already provided you all the bases of the hypothesis. If you're refusing to engage - that's on you.
>I have quite literally said that any structured treatment is good and have agreed with you that your magnets would be a fine approach. Trying therapy first makes a lot of sense because most people have "syndromes" as you say and therapy is quite effective there.
>
Please reread what I have actually said, I never disagreed with using transcranial stimulation. My point is to try therapy first.
You has put any approach under the same category with the implication that if DBT wouldn't work, then nothing else would, because "It all just boils down" and "whatever. It doesn't matter"
>>81919799
>There's plenty of evidence that DBT works though. It all just boils down to manipulating the processing stack. You can do it via drugs, therapy, magnets, whatever. It doesn't matter
>That *is* a pattern! Sensory overload can be combated purely cognitively with e.g., meditation
>all healthy humans know how to emotionally regulate. I would not expect a dog to learn math, I would expect a human to learn emotional regulation.
I'll see how well you'll emotionally regulate and meditate on patterns while both of your tibia bones break.
>What is the actual reduction in matter? What is the limit where the reduction in matter precludes unlearning and relearning?
Research data's ~24% (as far as I remember. It was whatever it was written) reduction evidence and circumstantial evidence (because there's no further research) suggest ~24% is the cutoff.
Don't like the discussion? You're talking with a BPDemon after the BPDemon tried DBT further than its author did.