>>718008142
Your asking the wrong question here anon. Someone at some point found this kind of stuff appealing and made a piece just like this. Then AI trained off of it and other pics like it, and it creates sloppy seconds.
You shouldnt ask "Do you find this artwork appealing?" because these kind of pics existed before AI, in fact they had to or else AI couldnt train itself to make such a good copy. You need to ask "Do you want this pic coming from an artist or do you wan a machine to regurgitate a sloppified version of the same thing?"
Its those that choose the latter that are the real subhumans cause 1.) They do not go out to seek out good work, they prefer to just let the machine shit out something and call it a day. 2.) They shit all over human creators and their craft stating that the machine can produce better artwork even though that good artwork HAS to have been made by a human at some point in time and 3.) The most crucial point, they think that humanity has reached its limit and has given up on humanity, and they will brag how they could give less of a fuck about a humans creation and WOULD prefer to sleep in the pod and eat da bugz just to spite other humans. Its a self destructive way of thinking, and as for me, personally, not a fan.
