>>23049939
Hey fren. Where have you been? I thought you moved on for a second.
As for pic rel, I admit I was wrong. I believe the context of that comment was encouraging anons to namefag specifically, not to use their actual information. It would be nice if anons could work together in a more transparent way. I think that 'anon' ultimately works against us gaining consensus, which is why so many anons gravitate towards political grifters and such.
But ultimately you are right, our identity is also a weakness because people like you are willing to weaponize it. So, congratulations for being a part of the problem, fren.
